From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20031008172506.020cef30@unixmail.qualcomm.com> Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2003 17:35:53 -0700 To: Marcel Holtmann , BlueZ Mailing List From: Max Krasnyansky Subject: Re: [Bluez-devel] New SDP client library In-Reply-To: <1061810955.972.100.camel@pegasus> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" List-ID: At 04:29 AM 8/25/2003, Marcel Holtmann wrote: >Hi Folks, > >in the last two months I have done much work with the current SDP >implementation. The library is full featured and works fine for me in >all situations, but the programming interface is a mess. It is not easy >to get the service name or the number of the RFCOMM channel. You have to >play with internal SDP lists, pointer of pointer stuff and static >assigned UUID's. Since I already have rewritten most of the HCI part >from scratch for the new Bluetooth library, Hmm, what do you mean by that ? As far as I can (in CVS) core functions like hci_open(), hci_send_request(), etc are the same. >The simple interface will have of course a lot of limitations, but these >can all be eliminated by using the full interface if needed. I tested >the new version with all my devices on my desktop and it works flawless. Cool. >I will now clean up the internal stuff a little bit and then place it >into the libs2 CVS instead of the "old" one. Comments? Looks good to me. We've been talking about simplifying SDP library for quite a while. And I completely support the idea. Thanks Max