All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Satchell <list@fluent2.pyramid.net>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Profiling disk usage on selected branches of a file system
Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2003 05:58:31 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5.2.1.1.0.20031007054856.019687a8@fluent2.pyramid.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20031007130551.36899cd9.MalteSch@gmx.de>

I have a number of servers that are disk-bound, and I'm trying to convince 
the boss to split out the single disk drive to separate disk drives to 
increase I/O throughput.  I've been using VMSTAT to show just how 
disk-bound we are, but I can't get any traction toward using multiple 
drives until I can show a clear, positive, and immediate benefit.

Searching the archives, I didn't see discussion of methods of monitoring 
separate parts of a file system, other than building separate partitions 
and using /proc/partitions to measure what happens there.  This isn't an 
option.  (There is some political inertia here, as well as a heavy dose of 
NIH.)

Any help welcome.

My hypothesis:  we need three separate drives, one for OS/code/swap/logs, 
one for /home (Web pages, scripts, and user data), and one devoted to 
MySQL/PostgreSQL.  The "right" way to do the job would be to have the 
databases on a completely separate computer, but that's out because of 
proprietary-software issues.

You can see the Catch-22.

Put together a single server to try the concept?  "Please, you must be 
joking,   Our servers are working just fine!"

grumble grumble NIH grumble grumble

Satch


  reply	other threads:[~2003-10-07 13:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-10-06 13:29 3c59x on 2.6.0-test3->test6 slow Domen Puncer
2003-10-06 21:23 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2003-10-06 22:33   ` Domen Puncer
2003-10-06 22:43     ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2003-10-06 23:44       ` Domen Puncer
2003-10-07  0:18         ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2003-10-07  4:31           ` Malte Schröder
2003-10-07 11:05             ` Malte Schröder
2003-10-07 12:58               ` Stephen Satchell [this message]
2003-10-07  7:49           ` Domen Puncer
2003-10-07 23:43             ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2003-10-08 15:05               ` Domen Puncer
2003-10-09  1:53                 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2003-10-09  8:49                   ` Domen Puncer
2003-10-09 23:10                     ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2003-10-09 23:55                       ` Domen Puncer
2003-10-13  0:22                         ` Domen Puncer
2003-10-13  0:37                           ` Andrew Morton
2003-10-13  2:28                             ` Domen Puncer
2003-10-13  3:03                               ` Andrew Morton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5.2.1.1.0.20031007054856.019687a8@fluent2.pyramid.net \
    --to=list@fluent2.pyramid.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.