At 03:12 PM 7/16/2003 -0700, Davide Libenzi wrote:

>http://www.xmailserver.org/linux-patches/irman2.c
>
>and run it with different -n (number of tasks) and -b (CPU burn ms time).
>At the same time try to build a kernel for example. Then you will realize
>that interactivity is not the bigger problem that the scheduler has right
>now.

I added an irman2 load to contest.  Con's changes 06+06.1 stomped it flat 
[1].  irman2 is modified to run for 30s at a time, but with default parameters.

         -Mike

[1] imho a little too flat.  it also made a worrisome impression on apache 
bench