All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
To: Nick Piggin <piggin@cyberone.com.au>
Cc: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>,
	Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>,
	linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	Felipe Alfaro Solana <felipe_alfaro@linuxmail.org>,
	Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@arm.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] O6int for interactivity
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2003 12:18:33 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5.2.1.1.2.20030718120229.01a8fcf0@pop.gmx.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3F1794F0.1090803@cyberone.com.au>

At 04:34 PM 7/18/2003 +1000, Nick Piggin wrote:

>Mike Galbraith wrote:
>
>>no_load:
>>Kernel          [runs]  Time    CPU%    Loads   LCPU%   Ratio
>>2.5.69               1  153     94.8    0.0     0.0     1.00
>>2.5.70               1  153     94.1    0.0     0.0     1.00
>>2.6.0-test1          1  153     94.1    0.0     0.0     1.00
>>2.6.0-test1-mm1      1  152     94.7    0.0     0.0     1.00
>>cacherun:
>>Kernel          [runs]  Time    CPU%    Loads   LCPU%   Ratio
>>2.5.69               1  146     98.6    0.0     0.0     0.95
>>2.5.70               1  146     98.6    0.0     0.0     0.95
>>2.6.0-test1          1  146     98.6    0.0     0.0     0.95
>>2.6.0-test1-mm1      1  146     98.6    0.0     0.0     0.96
>>process_load:
>>Kernel          [runs]  Time    CPU%    Loads   LCPU%   Ratio
>>2.5.69               1  331     43.8    90.0    55.3    2.16
>>2.5.70               1  199     72.4    27.0    25.5    1.30
>>2.6.0-test1          1  264     54.5    61.0    44.3    1.73
>>2.6.0-test1-mm1      1  323     44.9    88.0    54.2    2.12
>>ctar_load:
>>Kernel          [runs]  Time    CPU%    Loads   LCPU%   Ratio
>>2.5.69               1  190     77.9    0.0     0.0     1.24
>>2.5.70               1  186     80.1    0.0     0.0     1.22
>>2.6.0-test1          1  213     70.4    0.0     0.0     1.39
>>2.6.0-test1-mm1      1  207     72.5    0.0     0.0     1.36
>>xtar_load:
>>Kernel          [runs]  Time    CPU%    Loads   LCPU%   Ratio
>>2.5.69               1  196     75.0    0.0     3.1     1.28
>>2.5.70               1  195     75.9    0.0     3.1     1.27
>>2.6.0-test1          1  193     76.7    1.0     4.1     1.26
>>2.6.0-test1-mm1      1  195     75.9    1.0     4.1     1.28
>>io_load:
>>Kernel          [runs]  Time    CPU%    Loads   LCPU%   Ratio
>>2.5.69               1  437     34.6    69.1    15.1    2.86
>>2.5.70               1  401     37.7    72.3    17.4    2.62
>>2.6.0-test1          1  243     61.3    48.1    17.3    1.59
>>2.6.0-test1-mm1      1  336     44.9    64.5    17.3    2.21
>
>Looks like gcc is getting less priority after a read completes.
>Keep an eye on this please.

That _might_ (add salt) be priorities of kernel threads dropping too low.

I'm also seeing occasional total stalls under heavy I/O in the order of 
10-12 seconds (even the disk stops).  I have no idea if that's something in 
mm or the scheduler changes though, as I've yet to do any isolation and/or 
tinkering.  All I know at this point is that I haven't seen it in stock yet.

         -Mike 


  reply	other threads:[~2003-07-18 10:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-07-16 14:30 [PATCH] O6int for interactivity Con Kolivas
2003-07-16 15:22 ` Felipe Alfaro Solana
2003-07-16 19:55   ` Marc-Christian Petersen
2003-07-16 17:08 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-07-16 21:59 ` Wiktor Wodecki
2003-07-16 22:30   ` Con Kolivas
2003-07-16 22:12 ` Davide Libenzi
2003-07-17  0:33   ` Con Kolivas
2003-07-17  0:35     ` Davide Libenzi
2003-07-17  1:12       ` Con Kolivas
2003-07-17  0:48     ` Wade
2003-07-17  1:15       ` Con Kolivas
2003-07-17  1:27         ` Eugene Teo
2003-07-17  3:05 ` Wes Janzen
2003-07-17  9:05 ` Alex Riesen
2003-07-17  9:14   ` Con Kolivas
2003-07-18  7:38     ` Alex Riesen
     [not found]       ` <Pine.LNX.4.44.0307251628500.26172-300000@localhost.localdomain>
2003-07-25 19:40         ` Alex Riesen
     [not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.55.0307161241280.4787@bigblue.dev.mcafeelabs.co m>
2003-07-18  5:38   ` Mike Galbraith
2003-07-18  6:34     ` Nick Piggin
2003-07-18 10:18       ` Mike Galbraith [this message]
2003-07-18 10:31         ` Wiktor Wodecki
2003-07-18 10:43           ` Con Kolivas
2003-07-18 11:34             ` Wiktor Wodecki
2003-07-18 11:38               ` Nick Piggin
2003-07-19 10:59                 ` Wiktor Wodecki
2003-07-18 15:46           ` Mike Galbraith
2003-07-18 16:52             ` Davide Libenzi
2003-07-18 17:05               ` Davide Libenzi
2003-07-18 17:39                 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-07-18 19:31                   ` Davide Libenzi
     [not found]                 ` <Pine.LNX.4.55.0307181038450.5608@bigblue.dev.mcafeelabs.co m>
2003-07-18 20:31                   ` Mike Galbraith
2003-07-18 20:38                     ` Davide Libenzi
     [not found]                 ` <Pine.LNX.4.55.0307181333520.5608@bigblue.dev.mcafeelabs.co m>
2003-07-19 17:04                   ` Mike Galbraith
2003-07-21  0:21                     ` Davide Libenzi
     [not found]                 ` <Pine.LNX.4.55.0307201715130.3548@bigblue.dev.mcafeelabs.co m>
2003-07-21  5:36                   ` Mike Galbraith
2003-07-21 12:39                   ` [NOTAPATCH] " Mike Galbraith
2003-07-21 17:13                     ` Mike Galbraith
2003-07-18 14:24         ` Con Kolivas
2003-07-18 15:50           ` Mike Galbraith
2003-07-18 13:46     ` Davide Libenzi
     [not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.55.0307180630450.5077@bigblue.dev.mcafeelabs.co m>
2003-07-18 15:41   ` Mike Galbraith
     [not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.55.0307180951050.5608@bigblue.dev.mcafeelabs.co m>
2003-07-18 18:49   ` Mike Galbraith
2003-07-16 20:20 Shane Shrybman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5.2.1.1.2.20030718120229.01a8fcf0@pop.gmx.net \
    --to=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=davidel@xmailserver.org \
    --cc=felipe_alfaro@linuxmail.org \
    --cc=kernel@kolivas.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=piggin@cyberone.com.au \
    --cc=zwane@arm.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.