From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com>
Subject: Re: nr_irqs_gsi
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2012 14:30:37 +0100
Message-ID: <500D6E1D020000780008FECB@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
References: <4FFCF3AE.1050200@oracle.com> <4FFD4A72.9090500@citrix.com>
	<20120711140057.GA16523@phenom.dumpdata.com>
	<4FFE33A9.3060203@oracle.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
In-Reply-To: <4FFE33A9.3060203@oracle.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Joe Jin <joe.jin@oracle.com>, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>, xen-devel@lists.xen.org
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

>>> On 12.07.12 at 04:17, Joe Jin <joe.jin@oracle.com> wrote:
>>>> (XEN) ACPI: IOAPIC (id[0x00] address[0xfec00000] gsi_base[0])
>>>> (XEN) IOAPIC[0]: apic_id 0, version 32, address 0xfec00000, GSI 0-23
>>>> (XEN) ACPI: IOAPIC (id[0x01] address[0xfec80000] gsi_base[32])
>>>> (XEN) IOAPIC[1]: apic_id 1, version 32, address 0xfec80000, GSI 32-55
>
> Below came from dom0:
> 
> ACPI: LAPIC_NMI (acpi_id[0xff] high edge lint[0x1])
> ACPI: IOAPIC (id[0x00] address[0xfec00000] gsi_base[0])
> IOAPIC[0]: apic_id 0, version 255, address 0xfec00000, GSI 0-255

Now this and ...

> ACPI: IOAPIC (id[0x01] address[0xfec80000] gsi_base[32])
> IOAPIC[1]: apic_id 1, version 255, address 0xfec80000, GSI 32-287

... this is clearly bogus, contradicting what Xen itself prints (see
above).

Jan