From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from va3outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (va3ehsobe006.messaging.microsoft.com [216.32.180.16]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.global.frontbridge.com", Issuer "Microsoft Secure Server Authority" (not verified)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 71A7B2C0080 for ; Thu, 26 Jul 2012 22:39:36 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <50113A72.4000508@freescale.com> Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 15:39:14 +0300 From: Claudiu Manoil MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kumar Gala Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/85xx: Fix sram_offset parameter type References: <1342693696-29734-1-git-send-email-claudiu.manoil@freescale.com> <37C94886-3DA3-4389-8A67-F13035D2CEA6@kernel.crashing.org> In-Reply-To: <37C94886-3DA3-4389-8A67-F13035D2CEA6@kernel.crashing.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 7/19/2012 3:07 PM, Kumar Gala wrote: > > On Jul 19, 2012, at 5:28 AM, Claudiu Manoil wrote: > >> The sram_offset parameter represents a physical address >> and should be of type phys_addr_t. As part of this fix, >> the extraction of sram_params is being cleaned-up and >> fixed. >> This patch fixes now the case when the offset value of >> 0xfff00000 was being rejected by the driver (returning >> -EINVAL), although this is a valid offset value. >> >> Signed-off-by: Tang Yuantian >> Signed-off-by: Claudiu Manoil >> --- >> arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_cache_ctlr.h | 4 +- >> arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_l2ctlr.c | 39 ++++++++++------------------ >> 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_cache_ctlr.h b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_cache_ctlr.h >> index 60c9c0b..a4ce9b8 100644 >> --- a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_cache_ctlr.h >> +++ b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_cache_ctlr.h >> @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ >> /* >> - * Copyright 2009-2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc >> + * Copyright 2009-2010 2012 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc > > we normally do 2009-2010, 2012 > Hi Kumar, Should I re-spin this patch, with the copyright year formatted per your suggestion above? Thanks, claudiu