From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2012 09:32:57 -0600
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 5/7] dfu:cmd: Support for DFU u-boot command
In-Reply-To: <20120803081357.159053ec@amdc308.digital.local>
References: <1341308291-14663-1-git-send-email-l.majewski@samsung.com>
	<1343716623-8943-1-git-send-email-l.majewski@samsung.com>
	<1343716623-8943-6-git-send-email-l.majewski@samsung.com>
	<50181267.7000005@wwwdotorg.org>
	<20120801091647.6a8ba9d5@amdc308.digital.local>
	<501963AA.90102@wwwdotorg.org>
	<20120802103146.5b70f39f@amdc308.digital.local>
	<501AA254.5070407@wwwdotorg.org>
	<20120803081357.159053ec@amdc308.digital.local>
Message-ID: <501BEF29.2030002@wwwdotorg.org>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

On 08/03/2012 12:13 AM, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
> Dear Stephen Warren,
> 
>> Again, this is confusing two different kinds of partitions.
>>
>> There are HW-level partitions/regions/areas within the eMMC HW itself.
>> You need to send commands to the eMMC device to select whether
>> read/write commands act on the boot0/boot1/general*/user HW partition.
> 
> This will be done via "mmc boot [dev] [HW partition (boot0/1/user]"
> command (from u-boot prompt).

Hmm. I still fail to see how this is any different to the existing "mmc
dev" command. Are the following two commands not exactly identical:

mmc dev $dev $part      # already exists today
mmc boot $dev $part     # new command you're proposing

?

> This command is not yet implemented at u-boot (at least for Trats
> development board).
> After its implementation it will be used as a helper function for dfu.