From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754793Ab2HGN7p (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Aug 2012 09:59:45 -0400 Received: from mx2.parallels.com ([64.131.90.16]:53614 "EHLO mx2.parallels.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751982Ab2HGN7n (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Aug 2012 09:59:43 -0400 Message-ID: <50211F3D.2000008@parallels.com> Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2012 17:59:25 +0400 From: Glauber Costa User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120717 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Morton CC: David Rientjes , , , , Frederic Weisbecker , Pekka Enberg , Michal Hocko , Johannes Weiner , Christoph Lameter , , , Tejun Heo , Rik van Riel , Daniel Lezcano , Kay Sievers , Lennart Poettering , "Kirill A. Shutemov" , Kir Kolyshkin Subject: Re: Fork bomb limitation in memcg WAS: Re: [PATCH 00/11] kmem controller for memcg: stripped down version References: <1340633728-12785-1-git-send-email-glommer@parallels.com> <20120625162745.eabe4f03.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <4FE9621D.2050002@parallels.com> <20120626145539.eeeab909.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <4FEAD260.4000603@parallels.com> <4FEC1D63.6000903@parallels.com> <20120628152540.cc13a735.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20120628152540.cc13a735.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 06/29/2012 02:25 AM, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Thu, 28 Jun 2012 13:01:23 +0400 > Glauber Costa wrote: > >> >> ... >> > > OK, that all sounds convincing ;) Please summarise and capture this > discussion in the [patch 0/n] changelog so we (or others) don't have to > go through this all again. And let's remember this in the next > patchset! > >> Last, but not least, note that it is totally within my interests to >> merge the slab tracking as fast as we can. it'll be a matter of going >> back to it, and agreeing in the final form. > > Yes, I'd very much like to have the whole slab implementation in a > reasonably mature state before proceeding too far with this base > patchset. > So, that was posted separately as well. Although there is a thing to fix here and there - all of them I am working on already - I believe that to be mature enough. Do you have any comments on that? Would you be willing to take this first part (modified with the comments on this thread itself) and let it start sitting in the tree? Thanks! From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from psmtp.com (na3sys010amx109.postini.com [74.125.245.109]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EED2A6B004D for ; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 09:59:43 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <50211F3D.2000008@parallels.com> Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2012 17:59:25 +0400 From: Glauber Costa MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Fork bomb limitation in memcg WAS: Re: [PATCH 00/11] kmem controller for memcg: stripped down version References: <1340633728-12785-1-git-send-email-glommer@parallels.com> <20120625162745.eabe4f03.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <4FE9621D.2050002@parallels.com> <20120626145539.eeeab909.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <4FEAD260.4000603@parallels.com> <4FEC1D63.6000903@parallels.com> <20120628152540.cc13a735.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20120628152540.cc13a735.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Andrew Morton Cc: David Rientjes , cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Frederic Weisbecker , Pekka Enberg , Michal Hocko , Johannes Weiner , Christoph Lameter , devel@openvz.org, kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com, Tejun Heo , Rik van Riel , Daniel Lezcano , Kay Sievers , Lennart Poettering , "Kirill A. Shutemov" , Kir Kolyshkin On 06/29/2012 02:25 AM, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Thu, 28 Jun 2012 13:01:23 +0400 > Glauber Costa wrote: > >> >> ... >> > > OK, that all sounds convincing ;) Please summarise and capture this > discussion in the [patch 0/n] changelog so we (or others) don't have to > go through this all again. And let's remember this in the next > patchset! > >> Last, but not least, note that it is totally within my interests to >> merge the slab tracking as fast as we can. it'll be a matter of going >> back to it, and agreeing in the final form. > > Yes, I'd very much like to have the whole slab implementation in a > reasonably mature state before proceeding too far with this base > patchset. > So, that was posted separately as well. Although there is a thing to fix here and there - all of them I am working on already - I believe that to be mature enough. Do you have any comments on that? Would you be willing to take this first part (modified with the comments on this thread itself) and let it start sitting in the tree? Thanks! -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Glauber Costa Subject: Re: Fork bomb limitation in memcg WAS: Re: [PATCH 00/11] kmem controller for memcg: stripped down version Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2012 17:59:25 +0400 Message-ID: <50211F3D.2000008@parallels.com> References: <1340633728-12785-1-git-send-email-glommer@parallels.com> <20120625162745.eabe4f03.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <4FE9621D.2050002@parallels.com> <20120626145539.eeeab909.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <4FEAD260.4000603@parallels.com> <4FEC1D63.6000903@parallels.com> <20120628152540.cc13a735.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20120628152540.cc13a735.akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org> Sender: cgroups-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Andrew Morton Cc: David Rientjes , cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Frederic Weisbecker , Pekka Enberg , Michal Hocko , Johannes Weiner , Christoph Lameter , devel-GEFAQzZX7r8dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, kamezawa.hiroyu-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org, Tejun Heo , Rik van Riel , Daniel Lezcano , Kay Sievers , Lennart Poettering , "Kirill A. Shutemov" , Kir Kolyshkin On 06/29/2012 02:25 AM, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Thu, 28 Jun 2012 13:01:23 +0400 > Glauber Costa wrote: > >> >> ... >> > > OK, that all sounds convincing ;) Please summarise and capture this > discussion in the [patch 0/n] changelog so we (or others) don't have to > go through this all again. And let's remember this in the next > patchset! > >> Last, but not least, note that it is totally within my interests to >> merge the slab tracking as fast as we can. it'll be a matter of going >> back to it, and agreeing in the final form. > > Yes, I'd very much like to have the whole slab implementation in a > reasonably mature state before proceeding too far with this base > patchset. > So, that was posted separately as well. Although there is a thing to fix here and there - all of them I am working on already - I believe that to be mature enough. Do you have any comments on that? Would you be willing to take this first part (modified with the comments on this thread itself) and let it start sitting in the tree? Thanks!