All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
	yrl.pp-manager.tt@hitachi.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/4] ftrace: Do not test frame pointers if -mfentry is used
Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2012 11:58:58 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50232772.4070102@hitachi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1344430148.6935.17.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>

(2012/08/08 21:49), Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-08-08 at 13:34 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>>  
>>> -#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_FUNCTION_GRAPH_FP_TEST
>>> +#if defined(CONFIG_HAVE_FUNCTION_GRAPH_FP_TEST) && !defined(CC_USING_FENTRY)
>>
>> I think CONFIG_HAVE_FENTRY would better unselect
>> CONFIG_HAVE_FUNCTION_GRAPH_FP_TEST in arch/x86/Kconfig explicitly.
> 
> No, CONFIG_HAVE_FENTRY just means fentry is supported, it does not mean
> that it is being used. It only gets used if CC_USING_FENTRY is set,
> which is set by the Makefile at time of compile.
> 
> If CONFIG_HAVE_FENTRY is defined, a test is done to see if the gcc
> compiling the kernel supports -mfentry. If it does, then it defines the
> CC_USING_FENTRY macro, if not, the macro is not defined and the old way
> is performed.
> 
> If the old way is performed, even if CONFIG_HAVE_FENTRY is defined, then
> we still need the above test. We can not have CONFIG_HAVE_FENTRY
> unselect CONFIG_HAVE_FUNCTION_GRAPH_FP_TEST.

Ah, I see. OK, I don't see any other issue.

Thank you,

-- 
Masami HIRAMATSU
Software Platform Research Dept. Linux Technology Center
Hitachi, Ltd., Yokohama Research Laboratory
E-mail: masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com



  reply	other threads:[~2012-08-09  2:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-08-07 19:38 [RFC PATCH 0/4] ftrace: Add use of -mfentry for x86_64 Steven Rostedt
2012-08-07 19:38 ` [RFC PATCH 1/4] ftrace: Make recordmcount.c handle __fentry__ Steven Rostedt
2012-08-07 23:57   ` John Reiser
2012-08-08  0:05     ` Steven Rostedt
2012-08-27 17:03   ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Steven Rostedt
2012-08-07 19:38 ` [RFC PATCH 2/4] ftrace: Add -mfentry to Makefile on function tracer Steven Rostedt
2012-08-27 17:04   ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Steven Rostedt
2012-08-07 19:38 ` [RFC PATCH 3/4] ftrace: Do not test frame pointers if -mfentry is used Steven Rostedt
2012-08-08  4:34   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2012-08-08 12:49     ` Steven Rostedt
2012-08-09  2:58       ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2012-08-09  3:45       ` Linus Torvalds
2012-08-09  3:57         ` Steven Rostedt
2012-08-09  4:15         ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-08-09 12:37         ` Andi Kleen
2012-08-27 17:05   ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Steven Rostedt
2012-08-07 19:38 ` [RFC PATCH 4/4] ftrace/x86: Add support for -mfentry to x86_64 Steven Rostedt
2012-08-09  8:34   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2012-08-09 13:46   ` Steven Rostedt
2012-08-09 13:48     ` Steven Rostedt
2012-08-10  7:45     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2012-08-27 17:06   ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Steven Rostedt
2012-08-07 20:23 ` [RFC PATCH 0/4] ftrace: Add use of -mfentry for x86_64 H. Peter Anvin
2012-08-13  8:42   ` Ingo Molnar
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-02-09 20:02 [RFC][PATCH 0/4] ftrace: Use -mfentry when supported (this is for x86_64 right now) Steven Rostedt
2011-02-09 20:02 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/4] ftrace: Do not test frame pointers if -mfentry is used Steven Rostedt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50232772.4070102@hitachi.com \
    --to=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=yrl.pp-manager.tt@hitachi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.