From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI / ACPI: Always resume devices on ACPI wakeup notifications Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2013 00:49:08 +0200 Message-ID: <5030643.tE4LAX0txW@vostro.rjw.lan> References: <2282655.IicBMMa6jN@vostro.rjw.lan> <515AF312.1010507@fold.natur.cuni.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: Received: from hydra.sisk.pl ([212.160.235.94]:50386 "EHLO hydra.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752739Ab3DBWle (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Apr 2013 18:41:34 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Bjorn Helgaas Cc: Martin Mokrejs , huang ying , ACPI Devel Maling List , Len Brown , Matthew Garrett , Sarah Sharp On Tuesday, April 02, 2013 10:30:54 AM Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 9:02 AM, Martin Mokrejs > wrote: > > Hi Ying, > > > > huang ying wrote: > > >> And please give me the full dmesg for boot and incremental dmesg for > >> operations. > > > > > > The incremental bits here, the full dmesg will send only directly to your email, due to its size. > > Is there a bugzilla for this issue? Please attach the complete dmesg > there or somewhere similar so we can all benefit. > > I think we have two problems that may be relevant to this discussion. > > 1) The _OSC "PCI Express Capability Structure control" bit. I don't > think Linux pays attention to whether the BIOS has granted us control > over the capability, so we may do things to it that the BIOS doesn't > expect. Yes, it does, as far as I can say. Thanks, Rafael -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.