From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id q7SE1vxS104152 for ; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 09:01:57 -0500 Message-ID: <503CCF8F.8070806@sgi.com> Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 09:02:55 -0500 From: Rich Johnston MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/10] xfstests: always us test option when checking large scratch device References: <1343291989-14987-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> <1343291989-14987-8-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> In-Reply-To: <1343291989-14987-8-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On 07/26/2012 03:39 AM, Dave Chinner wrote: > From: Dave Chinner > > Some tests call _check_scratch_device directly and when using a > large filesystem this needs to run with a -t option to avoid > consuming large amounts of memory. Make this happen in all cases > that the scratch device is checked. > > Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner > --- > 017 | 7 ++----- > common.rc | 2 ++ > 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > Looks good. Reviewed-by: Rich Johnston Regards --Rich _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs