From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Jan Beulich" Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Xen 4.2 TODO / Release Plan Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2012 16:43:12 +0100 Message-ID: <5040F7B00200007800097E94@nat28.tlf.novell.com> References: <1346148361.9975.3.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> <1346425932.27277.230.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1346425932.27277.230.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Ian Campbell Cc: "george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com" , xen-devel List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org >>> On 31.08.12 at 17:12, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Tue, 2012-08-28 at 11:06 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > >> hypervisor, nice to have: >> >> * [BUG(?)] Under certain conditions, the p2m_pod_sweep code will >> stop halfway through searching, causing a guest to crash even if >> there was zeroed memory available. This is NOT a regression >> from 4.1, and is a very rare case, so probably shouldn't be a >> blocker. (In fact, I'd be open to the idea that it should wait >> until after the release to get more testing.) >> (George Dunlap) > >> * fix high change rate to CMOS RTC periodic interrupt causing >> guest wall clock time to lag (possible fix outlined, needs to be >> put in patch form and thoroughly reviewed/tested for unwanted >> side effects, Jan Beulich) > > I have a feeling one or both of these might be fixed already, is that > true? No, neither is afaict. I broke up the patch for the second and will submit just the core bits (hopefully still today, else early on Monday) to address the reported problem, leaving the rest of the fixes for post-4.2. >> * S3 regression(s?) reported by Ben Guthro (Ben & Jan Beulich) > > AIUI this one isn't though. Correct. Jan