From: guido@trentalancia.com (Guido Trentalancia)
To: refpolicy@oss.tresys.com
Subject: [refpolicy] [PATCH 2/3] user access to DOS files
Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2012 18:31:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5048CFD9.2080408@trentalancia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120906162401.79ccd07b@eldamar.bigon.be>
On 06/09/2012 16:24, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> Le Tue, 4 Sep 2012 23:21:08 +0200,
> Laurent Bigonville <bigon@debian.org> a ?crit :
>
>> + tunable_policy(`user_manage_dos_files',`
>> + fs_manage_dos_dirs($1_t)
>> + fs_manage_dos_files($1_t)
>> + ')
>> +
>> ')
>
> I was reading the code further and isn't the proposed patch actually
> redundant with user_rw_noexattrfile?
>
> tunable_policy(`user_rw_noexattrfile',`
> fs_manage_noxattr_fs_files($1_t)
> fs_manage_noxattr_fs_dirs($1_t)
> ',`
> fs_read_noxattr_fs_files($1_t)
> ')
>
> So shouldn't the proposed patch simply be dropped?
Fortunately, it has not been applied, I think. And if it causes problems
and degradation of current policy, as you now recognize, why did you
post it in the first place then ?
> Cheers
>
> Laurent Bigonville
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-06 16:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-04 21:21 [refpolicy] [PATCH 1/3] Mark use of deprecated interfaces that are not providing replacement as errors Laurent Bigonville
2012-09-04 21:21 ` [refpolicy] [PATCH 2/3] user access to DOS files Laurent Bigonville
2012-09-04 23:45 ` Guido Trentalancia
2012-09-05 0:32 ` Russell Coker
2012-09-05 8:47 ` Guido Trentalancia
2012-09-05 7:00 ` Dominick Grift
2012-09-05 8:41 ` Guido Trentalancia
2012-09-05 13:24 ` Daniel J Walsh
2012-09-05 15:04 ` Guido Trentalancia
2012-09-06 11:14 ` [refpolicy] [PATCH]: turn all/most tunable policy booleans off by default (was Re: [PATCH 2/3] user access to DOS files) Guido Trentalancia
2012-09-06 12:54 ` Daniel J Walsh
2012-09-05 15:50 ` [refpolicy] [PATCH v2 2/3] user access to DOS filesystems Laurent Bigonville
2012-09-05 17:58 ` Christopher J. PeBenito
2012-09-06 14:24 ` [refpolicy] [PATCH 2/3] user access to DOS files Laurent Bigonville
2012-09-06 16:31 ` Guido Trentalancia [this message]
2012-09-06 16:39 ` Guido Trentalancia
2012-09-06 17:05 ` Guido Trentalancia
2012-09-04 21:21 ` [refpolicy] [PATCH 3/3] Allow iptables_t to do module_request Laurent Bigonville
2012-09-04 22:57 ` Guido Trentalancia
2012-09-05 0:30 ` Russell Coker
2012-09-05 8:48 ` Guido Trentalancia
2012-09-05 9:23 ` Laurent Bigonville
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5048CFD9.2080408@trentalancia.com \
--to=guido@trentalancia.com \
--cc=refpolicy@oss.tresys.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.