From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:56648) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TA1Pw-0005VY-Vr for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 07 Sep 2012 12:28:36 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TA1Pw-0003Xm-1k for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 07 Sep 2012 12:28:28 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:49161) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TA1Pv-0003Xg-OC for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 07 Sep 2012 12:28:27 -0400 Message-ID: <504A208F.60808@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2012 18:27:59 +0200 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <7ce0b59579ef332c57abed879ece12213281ee90.1346351079.git.jcody@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <7ce0b59579ef332c57abed879ece12213281ee90.1346351079.git.jcody@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC v2 PATCH 3/6] blockdev: rename block_stream_cb to a generic block_job_cb List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Jeff Cody Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, supriyak@linux.vnet.ibm.com, eblake@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, stefanha@gmail.com Il 30/08/2012 20:47, Jeff Cody ha scritto: > @@ -53,6 +53,8 @@ static const int if_max_devs[IF_COUNT] = { > [IF_SCSI] = 7, > }; > > +static void block_job_cb(void *opaque, int ret); > + > /* > * We automatically delete the drive when a device using it gets > * unplugged. Questionable feature, but we can't just drop it. Can you avoid the forward declaration? Paolo