From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andreas_F=E4rber?= Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/4] kvm: i386: Add classic PCI device assignment Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 17:33:04 +0200 Message-ID: <504E0830.1040007@suse.de> References: <825e653c9cfe9d8e26185917cbe1f1dd7ae299e2.1346048917.git.jan.kiszka@web.de> <503B62F4.9070500@suse.de> <87k3wjyy0e.fsf@codemonkey.ws> <503E227B.40904@suse.de> <874nndmrjs.fsf@codemonkey.ws> <50476F3E.7000100@redhat.com> <87wr081nq4.fsf@codemonkey.ws> <87zk54l1fd.fsf@codemonkey.ws> <87a9x49p0b.fsf@codemonkey.ws> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Blue Swirl , kvm@vger.kernel.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Alexey Kardashevskiy , Marcelo Tosatti , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Alex Williamson , Jan Kiszka , Avi Kivity , qemu-ppc To: Anthony Liguori Return-path: Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:50172 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753219Ab2IJPdJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Sep 2012 11:33:09 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87a9x49p0b.fsf@codemonkey.ws> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Am 05.09.2012 22:46, schrieb Anthony Liguori: > What do we do when the FSF comes out with the GPLv4 and relicenses ag= ain > in an incompatible fashion? Do we do this exercise every couple of > years? That's exactly why I suggested GPLv2+ because it was supposed to be a preparation for the future. I'm pretty sure I mentioned the potential GPLv4 back then! Andreas --=20 SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N=FCrnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imend=F6rffer; HRB 16746 AG N=FCrn= berg From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:58638) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TB5z7-00021r-FE for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 10 Sep 2012 11:33:23 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TB5z3-0001pW-EQ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 10 Sep 2012 11:33:13 -0400 Message-ID: <504E0830.1040007@suse.de> Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 17:33:04 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andreas_F=E4rber?= MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <825e653c9cfe9d8e26185917cbe1f1dd7ae299e2.1346048917.git.jan.kiszka@web.de> <503B62F4.9070500@suse.de> <87k3wjyy0e.fsf@codemonkey.ws> <503E227B.40904@suse.de> <874nndmrjs.fsf@codemonkey.ws> <50476F3E.7000100@redhat.com> <87wr081nq4.fsf@codemonkey.ws> <87zk54l1fd.fsf@codemonkey.ws> <87a9x49p0b.fsf@codemonkey.ws> In-Reply-To: <87a9x49p0b.fsf@codemonkey.ws> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/4] kvm: i386: Add classic PCI device assignment List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Anthony Liguori Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Alexey Kardashevskiy , Marcelo Tosatti , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Blue Swirl , Alex Williamson , Jan Kiszka , Avi Kivity , qemu-ppc Am 05.09.2012 22:46, schrieb Anthony Liguori: > What do we do when the FSF comes out with the GPLv4 and relicenses agai= n > in an incompatible fashion? Do we do this exercise every couple of > years? That's exactly why I suggested GPLv2+ because it was supposed to be a preparation for the future. I'm pretty sure I mentioned the potential GPLv4 back then! Andreas --=20 SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N=FCrnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imend=F6rffer; HRB 16746 AG N=FCrnbe= rg