From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Troy Kisky Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2012 10:07:47 -0700 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH V2 17/21] mx6: soc: add get_cpu_type In-Reply-To: References: <1348012989-19674-1-git-send-email-troy.kisky@boundarydevices.com> <1348281558-19520-1-git-send-email-troy.kisky@boundarydevices.com> <1348281558-19520-18-git-send-email-troy.kisky@boundarydevices.com> Message-ID: <505DF063.9010806@boundarydevices.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On 9/21/2012 7:50 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote: > Hi Troy, > > On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 11:39 PM, Troy Kisky > wrote: >> Add function to return the processor type. >> >> i.e. MX6Q, MX6DL, MX6SOLO, MX6SOLOLITE > On arch/arm/imx-common/cpu.c we have: > > static const char *get_imx_type(u32 imxtype) > { > switch (imxtype) { > case 0x63: > return "6Q"; /* Quad-core version of the mx6 */ > case 0x61: > return "6DS"; /* Dual/Solo version of the mx6 */ > case 0x60: > return "6SL"; /* Solo-Lite version of the mx6 */ > case 0x51: > return "51"; > case 0x53: > return "53"; > default: > return "??"; > } > } > > ,which seems to serve the same purpose. > > Regards, > > Fabio Estevam > No, not similar to get_imx_type, but it is similar to get_cpu_rev. I guess I should fix get_imx_type, and get_cpu_rev, instead of adding a new one. Thanks for the heads up! Troy