From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756148Ab2I1GIA (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Sep 2012 02:08:00 -0400 Received: from e28smtp08.in.ibm.com ([122.248.162.8]:53283 "EHLO e28smtp08.in.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754844Ab2I1GHU (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Sep 2012 02:07:20 -0400 Message-ID: <50653DB0.5090405@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 11:33:28 +0530 From: Raghavendra K T Organization: IBM User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120911 Thunderbird/15.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "H. Peter Anvin" CC: Avi Kivity , Peter Zijlstra , Marcelo Tosatti , Ingo Molnar , Rik van Riel , Srikar , "Nikunj A. Dadhania" , KVM , Jiannan Ouyang , chegu vinod , "Andrew M. Theurer" , LKML , Srivatsa Vaddagiri , Gleb Natapov , Andrew Jones Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/2] kvm: Improving undercommit,overcommit scenarios in PLE handler References: <20120921115942.27611.67488.sendpatchset@codeblue> <1348486479.11847.46.camel@twins> <50604988.2030506@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1348490165.11847.58.camel@twins> <50606050.309@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1348494895.11847.64.camel@twins> <50606B33.1040102@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <5061B437.8070300@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <5064101A.5070902@redhat.com> <50643745.6010202@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <506440AF.9080202@redhat.com> <506537C7.9070909@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <50653986.2000709@zytor.com> In-Reply-To: <50653986.2000709@zytor.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit x-cbid: 12092806-2000-0000-0000-00000946E019 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 09/28/2012 11:15 AM, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > On 09/27/2012 10:38 PM, Raghavendra K T wrote: >> + >> +bool kvm_overcommitted() >> +{ > > This better not be C... I think you meant I should have had like kvm_overcommitted(void) and (different function name perhaps) or is it the body of function?