From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Stephen Warren <swarren-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] pinctrl: use postcore_initcall
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 16:18:19 -0600
Message-ID: <5080802B.3000209@wwwdotorg.org>
References: <1350551224-12857-1-git-send-email-haojian.zhuang@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <devicetree-discuss-bounces+gldd-devicetree-discuss=m.gmane.org-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org>
In-Reply-To: <1350551224-12857-1-git-send-email-haojian.zhuang-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.ozlabs.org/options/devicetree-discuss>,
 <mailto:devicetree-discuss-request-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/devicetree-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org>
List-Help: <mailto:devicetree-discuss-request-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss>,
 <mailto:devicetree-discuss-request-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: devicetree-discuss-bounces+gldd-devicetree-discuss=m.gmane.org-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org
Sender: "devicetree-discuss"
 <devicetree-discuss-bounces+gldd-devicetree-discuss=m.gmane.org-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org>
To: Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org
List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org

On 10/18/2012 03:06 AM, Haojian Zhuang wrote:
> Since pins are configured in device driver, pinctrl driver should be
> loaded by those device driver. module_platform_driver() only declares
> pinctrl driver is in module_initcall privilege. Use postcore_initcall
> privilege instead.

I'm not convinced this is needed; doesn't deferred probe sort out the
dependencies correctly?

From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: swarren@wwwdotorg.org (Stephen Warren)
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 16:18:19 -0600
Subject: [PATCH 01/10] pinctrl: use postcore_initcall
In-Reply-To: <1350551224-12857-1-git-send-email-haojian.zhuang@gmail.com>
References: <1350551224-12857-1-git-send-email-haojian.zhuang@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <5080802B.3000209@wwwdotorg.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On 10/18/2012 03:06 AM, Haojian Zhuang wrote:
> Since pins are configured in device driver, pinctrl driver should be
> loaded by those device driver. module_platform_driver() only declares
> pinctrl driver is in module_initcall privilege. Use postcore_initcall
> privilege instead.

I'm not convinced this is needed; doesn't deferred probe sort out the
dependencies correctly?