All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
To: Jan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Btrfs: fix a tree mod bug while inserting a new root
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 08:39:45 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5085E751.9040406@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50857CD9.3040504@jan-o-sch.net>

On 10/23/2012 01:05 AM, Jan Schmidt wrote:
> Hi liubo,
> 
> On Mon, October 22, 2012 at 16:02 (+0200), Liu Bo wrote:
>> According to btree's balance algorithm, when we split a root into two parts,
>> we insert a new one to be their parent:
>>
>>                                                  new root
>>             node A                            /              \
>>       | x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 |   =>          node A             node A'
>>                                     | x1 x2 x3 - - - |  | x4 x5 x6 - - - |
>>                              split
>>
>> The original root won't be freed because it becomes a child of the new root,
>> and a move to keep balance is needed then.
>>
>> So we should not add REMOVE_WHILE_FREEING keys for the old root, otherwise,
>> we will hit use-after-free since we first add REMOVE_WHILE_FREEING keys and
>> then add REMOVE keys, which is invalid.
> 
> I don't like adding another parameter there, the function is already confusing
> without it. I've got a different fix for that problem here as well. I haven't
> been sending it since Friday because there's at least one additional problem in
> the tree mod log, and I'd like to see all of the issues fixed.
> 
> There's also a fix for double frees from push_node_left here. That one may be
> fixing the other issue you're seeing (which I still cannot reproduce). I'm still
> not convinced it's a good idea to change the semantics in del_ptr as done in
> your previous patch set.
> 

If you have better fixes, that'd be good.

> Probably we can try working together on irc in a more interactive fashion? Or
> tell me if you want my patches anywhere before I send them out.
> 

OK, I'm on IRC now, lets rock it ;)

thanks,
liubo



      reply	other threads:[~2012-10-23  0:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-10-22 14:02 [PATCH] Btrfs: fix a tree mod bug while inserting a new root Liu Bo
2012-10-22 17:05 ` Jan Schmidt
2012-10-23  0:39   ` Liu Bo [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5085E751.9040406@oracle.com \
    --to=bo.li.liu@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.