Re: [media-workshop] Tentative Agenda for the November workshop

[Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>]

Hi Hans, Laurent,

On 10/23/2012 12:22 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> On Tuesday 23 October 2012 08:46:21 Hans Verkuil wrote:
>> On Tue October 23 2012 03:03:35 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>>> On Monday 22 October 2012 14:06:06 Hans Verkuil wrote:
>>>> On Mon October 22 2012 13:18:46 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>>>>> On Monday 22 October 2012 12:53:02 Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
>>>>>> On 10/22/2012 12:39 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>>>>>>> On Monday 22 October 2012 10:35:56 Hans Verkuil wrote:
>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This is the tentative agenda for the media workshop on November
>>>>>>>> 8, 2012. If you have additional things that you want to discuss,
>>>>>>>> or something is wrong or incomplete in this list, please let me
>>>>>>>> know so I can update the list.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thank you Hans for taking care of the agenda.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> - Explain current merging process (Mauro)
>>>>>>>> - Open floor for discussions on how to improve it (Mauro)
>>>>>>>> - Write down minimum requirements for new V4L2 (and DVB?)
>>>>>>>>   drivers, both for staging and mainline acceptance: which
>>>>>>>>   frameworks to use, v4l2-compliance, etc. (Hans Verkuil)
>>>>>>>> - V4L2 ambiguities (Hans Verkuil)
>>>>>>>> - TSMux device (a mux rather than a demux): Alain Volmat
>>>>>>>> - dmabuf status, esp. with regards to being able to test
>>>>>>>>   (Mauro/Samsung)
>>>>>>>> - Device tree support (Guennadi, not known yet whether this topic
>>>>>>>>   is needed) - Creating/selecting contexts for hardware that
>>>>>>>>   supports this (Samsung, only if time is available)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This last topic will likely require lots of brainstorming, and
>>>>>>> thus time. If the schedule permits, would anyone be interested in
>>>>>>> meeting earlier during the week already ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> My intention was to also possibly discuss it with others before the
>>>>>> actual media workshop. Would be nice if we could have arranged such
>>>>>> a meeting. I'm not sure about the room conditions though. It's
>>>>>> probably not a big issue, unless there is really many people
>>>>>> interested in that topic.
>>>>>
>>>>> A small room with a projector would be nice if possible, although not
>>>>> required. Who would be interested in attending a brainstorming session
>>>>> on contexts ?
>>>>
>>>> I would be, but the problem is that the conference is also interesting.
>>>
>>> More interesting than a brainstorming session about hardware contexts ?
>>> ;-) There's of course talks I want to attend, but I can probably skip some
>>> of them.
>>>
>>>> The only day I have really available is the Friday *after* the summit.
>>>
>>> We'll probably need several brainstorming sessions anyway. I'd like to
>>> organize one before the media summit though, as we'll have limited time to
>>> discuss the topic during the summit, which doesn't suit brainstorming
>>> sessions very well.
>>
>> Sylwester, would Samsung be able to prepare for a brainstorming session on
>> Monday or Tuesday? Both Laurent and myself have presentations on Wednesday,
>> so that's not the best day for such a session.

Kamil has presentation on Tuesday so there would be only Monday left.

>> Do you think we should do a half-day or a full day session on this?
> 
> Half a day should be more than enough to start with. The topic is quite 
> complex, and we'll need to sleep over it, several times. A full day would just 
> result in brain overheat. I was thinking more in the line of starting our 
> thought process, so maybe twice an hour or two hours would be good. That would 
> allow us to attend the ELCE talks as well :-) (there's definitely a couple of 
> them that I would like to listen to).

I agree, I wouldn't like to loose whole day of the conference for that
as well. One, two hours for the starters could be sufficient. So we can
possibly agree on some initial idea and could get back to it later.
I don't think I have already material for a full day session.

--

Regards,
Sylwester