From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753432Ab2KDLeL (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Nov 2012 06:34:11 -0500 Received: from pindarots.xs4all.nl ([80.101.128.228]:38037 "EHLO pindarots.xs4all.nl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753170Ab2KDLeI (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Nov 2012 06:34:08 -0500 X-Greylist: delayed 3747 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Sun, 04 Nov 2012 06:34:08 EST Message-ID: <509643EF.2060902@xs4all.nl> Date: Sun, 04 Nov 2012 11:31:11 +0100 From: Udo van den Heuvel User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121016 Thunderbird/16.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alan Stern CC: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, Jan Ceuleers , Clemens Ladisch , Simon Jones , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 3.4.4: disabling irq References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Well, The issue appeared again. irq 18 was disabled, one pwc webcam was on that irq. This time on new hardware: Gigabyte F2A85X-UP4 with A10-5800K APU. The box was busy with it's raid10 array, this time, by running bonnie++; also a raid-check was in progress. (unknown at the time) So what does this say? It appears not to be a hardware problem per se. Anyone? Kind regards, Udo