From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ivan Kuten Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 00:57:02 +0200 (EET) Subject: [U-Boot-Users] AT91 NAND om AT91SAM9260EK In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <50983.127.0.0.1.1170975422.squirrel@localhost> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de > > I tried to start the process of merging with mainstream U-boot > by sending in a patch which split the at45.c located in > board/at91rm9200dk into > * drivers/at45.c > * cpu/arm920t/at91rm9200/spi.c > but I have no feedback. > > Peter Pearse which will be responsible for maintaining the ARM part > is not up to speed yet, and noone else seems to be interested. > > There has been a discussion about how dataflash should be supported > but the things people do not like are not in this file, they > are in the "board/dataflash.c" file so I have no clue > why nothing is happening. > Hi Ulf, It's a good decision to move board/at91rm9200dk/at45.c into drivers/at45.c cause our custom RM9200 board uses at45.c too. We have dataflash only setup without NOR. Also may be as suggestion to make AT91C_SPI_PCS3_DATAFLASH_CARD #ifdefed because some boards such as ours may not use CS3 at all. Best regards, Ivan