From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755183Ab3ADQaj (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Jan 2013 11:30:39 -0500 Received: from avon.wwwdotorg.org ([70.85.31.133]:38347 "EHLO avon.wwwdotorg.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754901Ab3ADQag (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Jan 2013 11:30:36 -0500 Message-ID: <50E703A8.1080808@wwwdotorg.org> Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2013 09:30:32 -0700 From: Stephen Warren User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Prashant Gaikwad CC: mturquette@linaro.org, swarren@nvidia.com, grant.likely@secretlab.ca, linus.walleij@linaro.org, rob.herring@calxeda.com, maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com, linux@prisktech.co.nz, josh.cartwright@ni.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] clk: tegra: Use common of_clk_init() function References: <1357282858-2112-1-git-send-email-pgaikwad@nvidia.com> <1357282858-2112-2-git-send-email-pgaikwad@nvidia.com> In-Reply-To: <1357282858-2112-2-git-send-email-pgaikwad@nvidia.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 01/04/2013 12:00 AM, Prashant Gaikwad wrote: > Use common of_clk_init() function for clocks initialization. > drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra20.c | 3 ++- > drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra30.c | 3 ++- Oh, so this series is written assuming that the Tegra CCF rework is already applied then? That makes the dependencies quite painful, since I think we'll end up with the following order being needed: 1) clk: Add composite clock type -> This would usually go through the clk tree. 2) The Tegra CCF rework series -> This must go through the Tegra tree due to lots of dependencies and merge conflicts with other Tegra patches. 3) This series -> This would usually go through the clk tree. Is it possible to re-order the dependencies as (1) (3) (2), so that Mike can apply (1) and (3) to the clock tree, then I can use the clk tree as the basis for a branch in the Tegra tree to apply (2) and all the other Tegra patches that will conflict with (2)? From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: swarren@wwwdotorg.org (Stephen Warren) Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2013 09:30:32 -0700 Subject: [PATCH 2/7] clk: tegra: Use common of_clk_init() function In-Reply-To: <1357282858-2112-2-git-send-email-pgaikwad@nvidia.com> References: <1357282858-2112-1-git-send-email-pgaikwad@nvidia.com> <1357282858-2112-2-git-send-email-pgaikwad@nvidia.com> Message-ID: <50E703A8.1080808@wwwdotorg.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 01/04/2013 12:00 AM, Prashant Gaikwad wrote: > Use common of_clk_init() function for clocks initialization. > drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra20.c | 3 ++- > drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra30.c | 3 ++- Oh, so this series is written assuming that the Tegra CCF rework is already applied then? That makes the dependencies quite painful, since I think we'll end up with the following order being needed: 1) clk: Add composite clock type -> This would usually go through the clk tree. 2) The Tegra CCF rework series -> This must go through the Tegra tree due to lots of dependencies and merge conflicts with other Tegra patches. 3) This series -> This would usually go through the clk tree. Is it possible to re-order the dependencies as (1) (3) (2), so that Mike can apply (1) and (3) to the clock tree, then I can use the clk tree as the basis for a branch in the Tegra tree to apply (2) and all the other Tegra patches that will conflict with (2)?