On 21.01.2013 15:44, Andrey Borzenkov wrote: > В Sun, 20 Jan 2013 23:51:46 +0100 > Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko пишет: > >>> @deffn Command menuentry @var{title} @ >>> [@option{--class=class} @dots{}] [@option{--users=users}] @ >>> - [@option{--unrestricted}] [@option{--hotkey=key}] @ >>> + [@option{--unrestricted}] [@option{--hotkey=key}] [@option{--id=id}] @ >>> @{ @var{command}; @dots{} @} >>> This defines a GRUB menu entry named @var{title}. When this entry is >>> selected from the menu, GRUB will set the @var{chosen} environment variable >>> -to @var{title}, execute the list of commands given within braces, and if the >>> +to value of @option{--id} or @var{title} if @option{--id} is not given, >>> +execute the list of commands given within braces, and if the >> >> It's better to not mention the possible usage of title for this at all. >> Ehile it's kept for backward compatibility it has problems when language >> or disk name changes and hence discouraged. >> > > I understand that, but you still need to explain what happens when --id > is not given. Or make it mandatory argument. Such an entry would be considered as not identifiable other than by its number. The only reason why it's not so is because of backward compatibility. Documentation isn't just a description of the code but certain committment to what is considered right and supported. If user relies on something intentionally undocumented and gets bitten by it he has only himself to blame while if he does something according to doc it will be another case of figure. > >>> last command in the list returned successfully and a kernel was loaded it >>> will execute the @command{boot} command. >>> >>> @@ -3135,6 +3136,9 @@ >>> The @option{--hotkey} option associates a hotkey with a menu entry. >>> @var{key} may be a single letter, or one of the aliases @samp{backspace}, >>> @samp{tab}, or @samp{delete}. >>> + >>> +The @option{--id} may be used to associate unique identifier with a menu entry. >>> +@var{id} is arbitrary string. >> >> It has to be >> [a-zA-Z_][0-9a-zA-Z_]* > > It is not what grub currently does :) Do you really mean underscore? > Grub is currently using hyphen. > [a-zA-Z_-][0-9a-zA-Z_-]* >> (while arbitrary string would work it's not a good idea. >> > > Sure, but again - it can be arbitrary string. Nothing restricts > character set used. You're wrong on this. '>' has special meaning and purely numerical id wouldn't work either. Only [a-zA-Z_-][0-9a-zA-Z_-]* are guaranteed to work in future versions. > My goal is to document current grub behavior. Lying > about what it does just adds to confusion. I'm fine with adding "it is > recommended to restrict value @var{id} to alphanumeric ASCII > characters, hyphen and underscore for portability". > Again specifying in documentation what happens on bad ids would be committing to some form of handling of them which is counterproductive. -- Regards Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko