From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754938Ab3AWKuJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Jan 2013 05:50:09 -0500 Received: from arroyo.ext.ti.com ([192.94.94.40]:42997 "EHLO arroyo.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754597Ab3AWKuH (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Jan 2013 05:50:07 -0500 Message-ID: <50FFC02E.5090703@ti.com> Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 16:19:18 +0530 From: Sekhar Nori User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130107 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Brown CC: Matt Porter , Tony Lindgren , Grant Likely , Benoit Cousson , Russell King , Vinod Koul , Rob Landley , Chris Ball , Devicetree Discuss , Linux OMAP List , Linux ARM Kernel List , Linux DaVinci Kernel List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Documentation List , Linux MMC List , Linux SPI Devel List , Arnd Bergmann , Dan Williams , Rob Herring Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/14] DMA Engine support for AM33XX References: <1358281974-8411-1-git-send-email-mporter@ti.com> <50FEB6B2.5020303@ti.com> <20130123022133.GA5727@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> In-Reply-To: <20130123022133.GA5727@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Mark, On 1/23/2013 7:51 AM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 09:26:34PM +0530, Sekhar Nori wrote: >> On 1/16/2013 2:02 AM, Matt Porter wrote: > >>> This series adds DMA Engine support for AM33xx, which uses >>> an EDMA DMAC. The EDMA DMAC has been previously supported by only >>> a private API implementation (much like the situation with OMAP >>> DMA) found on the DaVinci family of SoCs. > >> Will you take this series through the OMAP tree? Only 1/14 touches >> mach-davinci and I am mostly okay with it except some changes I just >> requested Matt to make in another thread. > > Is this series somewhere near actually getting merged then? It seemed > like there was lots of stuff going on. I don't think there is a lot of churn on this now. 5 of the patches have already been acked by Tony. I had a look at the first two patches (from davinci perspective) and they mostly look good to me. That said, I was not intending to suggest the entire series was ready for merging. Since the series touches multiple areas of the kernel, I wanted to make sure we have one person shepherding the series towards mainline. Patch 1/14 has some changes in sound/ can you please take a look and ack them? Thanks, Sekhar From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sekhar Nori Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/14] DMA Engine support for AM33XX Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 16:19:18 +0530 Message-ID: <50FFC02E.5090703@ti.com> References: <1358281974-8411-1-git-send-email-mporter@ti.com> <50FEB6B2.5020303@ti.com> <20130123022133.GA5727@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20130123022133.GA5727-yzvPICuk2AATkU/dhu1WVueM+bqZidxxQQ4Iyu8u01E@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: spi-devel-general-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org To: Mark Brown Cc: Matt Porter , Linux DaVinci Kernel List , Linux OMAP List , Russell King , Benoit Cousson , Arnd Bergmann , Grant, Tony Lindgren , Rob, Linux Documentation List , Linux MMC List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Rob Herring , Vinod Koul , Landley , Dan Williams , Linux SPI Devel List , Chris Ball , Devicetree Discuss , Linux ARM Kernel List List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi Mark, On 1/23/2013 7:51 AM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 09:26:34PM +0530, Sekhar Nori wrote: >> On 1/16/2013 2:02 AM, Matt Porter wrote: > >>> This series adds DMA Engine support for AM33xx, which uses >>> an EDMA DMAC. The EDMA DMAC has been previously supported by only >>> a private API implementation (much like the situation with OMAP >>> DMA) found on the DaVinci family of SoCs. > >> Will you take this series through the OMAP tree? Only 1/14 touches >> mach-davinci and I am mostly okay with it except some changes I just >> requested Matt to make in another thread. > > Is this series somewhere near actually getting merged then? It seemed > like there was lots of stuff going on. I don't think there is a lot of churn on this now. 5 of the patches have already been acked by Tony. I had a look at the first two patches (from davinci perspective) and they mostly look good to me. That said, I was not intending to suggest the entire series was ready for merging. Since the series touches multiple areas of the kernel, I wanted to make sure we have one person shepherding the series towards mainline. Patch 1/14 has some changes in sound/ can you please take a look and ack them? Thanks, Sekhar ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS, MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft MVPs and experts. ON SALE this month only -- learn more at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnnow-d2d From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: nsekhar@ti.com (Sekhar Nori) Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 16:19:18 +0530 Subject: [PATCH v5 00/14] DMA Engine support for AM33XX In-Reply-To: <20130123022133.GA5727@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> References: <1358281974-8411-1-git-send-email-mporter@ti.com> <50FEB6B2.5020303@ti.com> <20130123022133.GA5727@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Message-ID: <50FFC02E.5090703@ti.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Mark, On 1/23/2013 7:51 AM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 09:26:34PM +0530, Sekhar Nori wrote: >> On 1/16/2013 2:02 AM, Matt Porter wrote: > >>> This series adds DMA Engine support for AM33xx, which uses >>> an EDMA DMAC. The EDMA DMAC has been previously supported by only >>> a private API implementation (much like the situation with OMAP >>> DMA) found on the DaVinci family of SoCs. > >> Will you take this series through the OMAP tree? Only 1/14 touches >> mach-davinci and I am mostly okay with it except some changes I just >> requested Matt to make in another thread. > > Is this series somewhere near actually getting merged then? It seemed > like there was lots of stuff going on. I don't think there is a lot of churn on this now. 5 of the patches have already been acked by Tony. I had a look at the first two patches (from davinci perspective) and they mostly look good to me. That said, I was not intending to suggest the entire series was ready for merging. Since the series touches multiple areas of the kernel, I wanted to make sure we have one person shepherding the series towards mainline. Patch 1/14 has some changes in sound/ can you please take a look and ack them? Thanks, Sekhar