From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 006B8C433DB for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 13:47:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C397361A0E for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 13:47:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235599AbhCXNqv (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Mar 2021 09:46:51 -0400 Received: from esa.microchip.iphmx.com ([68.232.154.123]:65108 "EHLO esa.microchip.iphmx.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235572AbhCXNqe (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Mar 2021 09:46:34 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=microchip.com; i=@microchip.com; q=dns/txt; s=mchp; t=1616593594; x=1648129594; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=FvPDaHUzjC9xXphePPStpuKbHidSjAiCxc54TOeg7kQ=; b=rlAJJapFZx2kXT0BtTiqo4JtAM7BAddpw6brxH5KLeiASN65imRKYMnH N32hPPMjnOtVLs5b391X2GdoW/MxEQ17ydLPXBzlnDUJEFVWGAbJJrS1u dVwMotRI8QG5rL8J/bBq90vu8SOWudW00XRHFKR1HztWBdr7z4ifTXGGl mDXAHnNv5e+CAuvdjr/O6uSy9mdpCMSbpu1l6J8J6EhMrlDyA9hQBa6gx WPOxwOxyFjYSS5MlL0NjXAGsaBMPOoatHG3fCG1HyDuyejbWqU3iYMITn cyGnDhG3rypqqW/HoeYbnhqO6juLbFJ+yJPJeD9OdzjG2we8W5n3M4yGM g==; IronPort-SDR: DRtHfB90mf+KI27pe5E+AvMDJgl1PYi7WKU3vUDSw7rxxgmYFlgOBL+f3Jor3JfosPHu/F94nQ ALtmpMiXq+v8q+NzHTCqdW8v4UUIRg/g9nlSWoUqVCz9ucYWPDfb+fgMps1C4Lx25UqjvTFFUB SVP6POFLhb6sh2hoLZS8avezM/SCcLYY59ljMI8r3yNB6YcdRxNZR1MkgYOrxfg53IAZkxiGc1 Dw0+aKT7NzbXyW8MrlMcahz+sJ71+I36l22QsP/Y2txh0Tb/Qr4EwNd0PBFCyWkJndtwOWDJFM cYI= X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.81,274,1610434800"; d="scan'208";a="48709226" Received: from smtpout.microchip.com (HELO email.microchip.com) ([198.175.253.82]) by esa6.microchip.iphmx.com with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA256; 24 Mar 2021 06:46:30 -0700 Received: from chn-vm-ex04.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.152) by chn-vm-ex04.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.152) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2176.2; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 06:46:26 -0700 Received: from [10.171.246.12] (10.10.115.15) by chn-vm-ex04.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.152) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.1.2176.2 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 06:46:24 -0700 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] Microship SAMA5D4 VPU support et al To: Emil Velikov , Ezequiel Garcia , devicetree , "Rob Herring" , Ludovic Desroches , Alexandre Belloni CC: Philipp Zabel , , linux-rockchip References: <20210311154055.3496076-1-emil.l.velikov@gmail.com> <5ecf1d3b8a8f88d6387a1549faeb4f4180cf5d4b.camel@collabora.com> From: Nicolas Ferre Organization: microchip Message-ID: <50b3b4b3-6c5b-3f1e-3499-c88574ce9f74@microchip.com> Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2021 14:44:14 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Emil, On 24/03/2021 at 13:49, Emil Velikov wrote: > On Tue, 16 Mar 2021 at 17:23, Ezequiel Garcia wrote: > >> On Thu, 2021-03-11 at 15:40 +0000, Emil Velikov wrote: >>> Emil Velikov (10): >>> media: hantro: use G1_REG_INTERRUPT directly for the mpeg2 >>> media: hantro: imx: reuse MB_DIM define >>> media: hantro: imx: remove duplicate dec_base init >>> media: hantro: imx: remove unused include >>> media: hantro: introduce hantro_g1.c for common API >> >> For patches 1-5: >> >> Reviewed-by: Ezequiel Garcia >> >>> media: dt-bindings: Document SAMA5D4 VDEC bindings >> >> This one need to be reviewed by DT maintainers, I think. >> > Rob can you help with this one? > >>> media: hantro: add initial SAMA5D4 support >> >> For patch 7: >> >> Reviewed-by: Ezequiel Garcia >> >>> ARM: dts: sama5d4: enable Hantro G1 VDEC >>> ARM: configs: at91: sama5: update with savedefconfig >>> ARM: configs: at91: sama5: enable the Hantro G1 engine >>> >> >> These need review from Microchip maintainers. >> > Alexandre, Ludovic, Nicolas > Do you have any input of the patches or series as a whole? The patch series looks good to me. If needed on patches that we don't take ourselves, you can add my: Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre Now, when we have the tag from Rob, how to coordinate these different pieces? Will it go through the media git tree? Will we benefit from a stable branch to share or will we just have to wait for the driver to hit Mainline before adding the defconfig and DT patches? > If you prefer we can drop the last two patches for the defconfig. I've > included those for posterity. No strong opinion on my side, except that defconfig stuff might be better handled in at91 + arm-soc trees because we'll have other changes to queue for 5.13. > Thanks for the review Eze. > Would you recommend that I resend the series with your R-B or it's > better to wait for feedback from others? Thanks a lot for this nice work. Best regards, -- Nicolas Ferre From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 783EAC433C1 for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 13:46:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from desiato.infradead.org (desiato.infradead.org [90.155.92.199]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D7B4619FE for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 13:46:50 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 1D7B4619FE Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=microchip.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-rockchip-bounces+linux-rockchip=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=desiato.20200630; h=Sender:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From: References:CC:To:Subject:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=8/28PlCagbVQ+39GYxjWNGXpyG594Jt7rekw1K9O3DU=; b=cutZvjGS/X0kOOMvNPC87Pp4X MOsT5/3m4LNqDa0PAL0yqRt2Ql/xVTplmFlz5WIf6hATmpRAnIyZjhi/t1UzBQ14D46S9Z0FlWIuy +AzElz74Rb/yrUjpQm2Etf8TP7P4H8hrAxgRUIFIE5LSDJMjzuZcx8pcmkk8rUT9TyMbsVqbLd/Ub tjB+rRHv44/qYOKlD399E+dB9az37obGNN9uMqr9mVfhbH4tqrPHYeRo6jBOUuMCnhb23T+kgV2FS baZ56GcrNm+PX2S67QD0Mw8KWZSSEZU1I1vaSYH7lR7HjuwN7sqmATFOsESnPGqDWl57TIQqS0QyY sX+pYLXBQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=desiato.infradead.org) by desiato.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1lP3qN-00HAZy-RW; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 13:46:44 +0000 Received: from esa.microchip.iphmx.com ([68.232.154.123]) by desiato.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1lP3qG-00HAZc-Oh for linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 13:46:42 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=microchip.com; i=@microchip.com; q=dns/txt; s=mchp; t=1616593596; x=1648129596; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=FvPDaHUzjC9xXphePPStpuKbHidSjAiCxc54TOeg7kQ=; b=qY4jThDk6urCvGQc+rmw0PVheFQu+WjM5rNj6ehzvNGY6QQjjb9um0O5 ZwYIkDuVur0qB2TFLl/iyZE+Q2HqFURmpJJtIh4PsOJkwZigIR7AfqnU1 SNOoOIS4rHVPAAHNtiofyMhgPMWgX9xuwOcPIXNLSocqAh5s7sjEhos0S J4a62UqB6/MYkB1nO5tWUqPQ8EeO6MBzbEbSSljFe4PN2ebZv7tBU8UKz KRCx38m+CqgBDscvD1HMR42EaauLZ0Zw9yNAx7tzTjVm7mqNMMn8LSRBv SGyyGjBNaWbpMUws1HJn6/dNioGdBMmDznNQy3ga1trP1yLov+Ul+FSyG A==; IronPort-SDR: DRtHfB90mf+KI27pe5E+AvMDJgl1PYi7WKU3vUDSw7rxxgmYFlgOBL+f3Jor3JfosPHu/F94nQ ALtmpMiXq+v8q+NzHTCqdW8v4UUIRg/g9nlSWoUqVCz9ucYWPDfb+fgMps1C4Lx25UqjvTFFUB SVP6POFLhb6sh2hoLZS8avezM/SCcLYY59ljMI8r3yNB6YcdRxNZR1MkgYOrxfg53IAZkxiGc1 Dw0+aKT7NzbXyW8MrlMcahz+sJ71+I36l22QsP/Y2txh0Tb/Qr4EwNd0PBFCyWkJndtwOWDJFM cYI= X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.81,274,1610434800"; d="scan'208";a="48709226" Received: from smtpout.microchip.com (HELO email.microchip.com) ([198.175.253.82]) by esa6.microchip.iphmx.com with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA256; 24 Mar 2021 06:46:30 -0700 Received: from chn-vm-ex04.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.152) by chn-vm-ex04.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.152) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2176.2; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 06:46:26 -0700 Received: from [10.171.246.12] (10.10.115.15) by chn-vm-ex04.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.152) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.1.2176.2 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 06:46:24 -0700 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] Microship SAMA5D4 VPU support et al To: Emil Velikov , Ezequiel Garcia , devicetree , "Rob Herring" , Ludovic Desroches , Alexandre Belloni CC: Philipp Zabel , , linux-rockchip References: <20210311154055.3496076-1-emil.l.velikov@gmail.com> <5ecf1d3b8a8f88d6387a1549faeb4f4180cf5d4b.camel@collabora.com> From: Nicolas Ferre Organization: microchip Message-ID: <50b3b4b3-6c5b-3f1e-3499-c88574ce9f74@microchip.com> Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2021 14:44:14 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20210324_134637_328067_7D8E2D41 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 20.12 ) X-BeenThere: linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Upstream kernel work for Rockchip platforms List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: "Linux-rockchip" Errors-To: linux-rockchip-bounces+linux-rockchip=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Emil, On 24/03/2021 at 13:49, Emil Velikov wrote: > On Tue, 16 Mar 2021 at 17:23, Ezequiel Garcia wrote: > >> On Thu, 2021-03-11 at 15:40 +0000, Emil Velikov wrote: >>> Emil Velikov (10): >>> media: hantro: use G1_REG_INTERRUPT directly for the mpeg2 >>> media: hantro: imx: reuse MB_DIM define >>> media: hantro: imx: remove duplicate dec_base init >>> media: hantro: imx: remove unused include >>> media: hantro: introduce hantro_g1.c for common API >> >> For patches 1-5: >> >> Reviewed-by: Ezequiel Garcia >> >>> media: dt-bindings: Document SAMA5D4 VDEC bindings >> >> This one need to be reviewed by DT maintainers, I think. >> > Rob can you help with this one? > >>> media: hantro: add initial SAMA5D4 support >> >> For patch 7: >> >> Reviewed-by: Ezequiel Garcia >> >>> ARM: dts: sama5d4: enable Hantro G1 VDEC >>> ARM: configs: at91: sama5: update with savedefconfig >>> ARM: configs: at91: sama5: enable the Hantro G1 engine >>> >> >> These need review from Microchip maintainers. >> > Alexandre, Ludovic, Nicolas > Do you have any input of the patches or series as a whole? The patch series looks good to me. If needed on patches that we don't take ourselves, you can add my: Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre Now, when we have the tag from Rob, how to coordinate these different pieces? Will it go through the media git tree? Will we benefit from a stable branch to share or will we just have to wait for the driver to hit Mainline before adding the defconfig and DT patches? > If you prefer we can drop the last two patches for the defconfig. I've > included those for posterity. No strong opinion on my side, except that defconfig stuff might be better handled in at91 + arm-soc trees because we'll have other changes to queue for 5.13. > Thanks for the review Eze. > Would you recommend that I resend the series with your R-B or it's > better to wait for feedback from others? Thanks a lot for this nice work. Best regards, -- Nicolas Ferre _______________________________________________ Linux-rockchip mailing list Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip