From: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@huawei.com>
To: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Cc: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@redhat.com>,
"Cong Wang" <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>,
"David Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Vladimir Oltean" <olteanv@gmail.com>,
"Alexei Starovoitov" <ast@kernel.org>,
"Daniel Borkmann" <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
"Andrii Nakryiko" <andriin@fb.com>,
"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@google.com>,
"Wei Wang" <weiwan@google.com>,
"Cong Wang ." <cong.wang@bytedance.com>,
"Taehee Yoo" <ap420073@gmail.com>,
"Linux Kernel Network Developers" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linuxarm@openeuler.org, "Marc Kleine-Budde" <mkl@pengutronix.de>,
linux-can@vger.kernel.org,
"Thomas Gschwantner" <tharre3@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Linuxarm] Re: [RFC v2] net: sched: implement TCQ_F_CAN_BYPASS for lockless qdisc
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2021 09:05:24 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50b730de-1546-144f-6cdf-3943de0a65ad@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHmME9qS-_H7Z5Gjw7SbZS0fO84vzpx4ZNHu0Ay=2krZpJQy3A@mail.gmail.com>
On 2021/3/20 3:03, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 1:33 AM Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@huawei.com> wrote:
>>> That offer definitely still stands. Generalization sounds like a lot of fun.
>>>
>>> Keep in mind though that it's an eventually consistent queue, not an
>>> immediately consistent one, so that might not match all use cases. It
>>> works with wg because we always trigger the reader thread anew when it
>>> finishes, but that doesn't apply to everyone's queueing setup.
>>
>> Thanks for mentioning this.
>>
>> "multi-producer, single-consumer" seems to match the lockless qdisc's
>> paradigm too, for now concurrent enqueuing/dequeuing to the pfifo_fast's
>> queues() is not allowed, it is protected by producer_lock or consumer_lock.
>
> The other thing is that if you've got memory for a ring buffer rather
> than a list queue, we worked on an MPMC ring structure for WireGuard a
> few years ago that we didn't wind up using in the end, but it lives
> here:
> https://git.zx2c4.com/wireguard-monolithic-historical/tree/src/mpmc_ptr_ring.h?h=tg/mpmc-benchmark
Thanks for mentioning that, It seems that is exactly what the
pfifo_fast qdisc need for locklees multi-producer, because it
only need the memory to store the skb pointer.
Does it have any limitation? More specifically, does it works with
the process or softirq context, if not, how about context with
rcu protection?
> _______________________________________________
> Linuxarm mailing list -- linuxarm@openeuler.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to linuxarm-leave@openeuler.org
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-22 1:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-13 2:47 [PATCH RFC] net: sched: implement TCQ_F_CAN_BYPASS for lockless qdisc Yunsheng Lin
2021-03-14 0:03 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-03-14 10:15 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2021-03-15 0:50 ` Yunsheng Lin
2021-03-15 3:10 ` [RFC v2] " Yunsheng Lin
2021-03-15 12:29 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-03-15 13:09 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2021-03-15 18:53 ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-03-16 0:35 ` Yunsheng Lin
2021-03-16 3:47 ` [Linuxarm] " Yunsheng Lin
2021-03-16 8:15 ` Eric Dumazet
2021-03-16 12:36 ` Yunsheng Lin
2021-03-16 22:48 ` Cong Wang
2021-03-17 1:14 ` Yunsheng Lin
2021-03-17 13:35 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-03-17 13:45 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2021-03-18 7:33 ` [Linuxarm] " Yunsheng Lin
2021-03-19 18:15 ` Cong Wang
2021-03-22 0:55 ` Yunsheng Lin
2021-03-24 1:49 ` Cong Wang
2021-03-24 2:36 ` Yunsheng Lin
2021-03-19 19:03 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2021-03-22 1:05 ` Yunsheng Lin [this message]
2021-03-18 7:10 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2021-03-18 7:46 ` Yunsheng Lin
2021-03-18 9:09 ` Ahmad Fatoum
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50b730de-1546-144f-6cdf-3943de0a65ad@huawei.com \
--to=linyunsheng@huawei.com \
--cc=Jason@zx2c4.com \
--cc=andriin@fb.com \
--cc=ap420073@gmail.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=cong.wang@bytedance.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-can@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxarm@openeuler.org \
--cc=mkl@pengutronix.de \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
--cc=tharre3@gmail.com \
--cc=toke@redhat.com \
--cc=weiwan@google.com \
--cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.