From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 250B3C48BE5 for ; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 08:58:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BEFA76141B for ; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 08:58:17 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org BEFA76141B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:54086 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lt4tk-0002lY-MR for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 04:58:16 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47916) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lt4sM-0001iS-V0 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 04:56:50 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.124]:51234) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lt4sL-0000yA-34 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 04:56:50 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1623747404; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=yjYRtHCLwilP8mM4y+qRMfayYRV2WeZwLZenqhkPldo=; b=Bq2gfU2XAGtcTS44fo7iCgqsj0X8ge1diPKmfnoj8keieK2Z1UhQLBTDv+61XOAb6tSz9H 9LyFmfTdAPYrcxY26DYTAlr+RgTgFLDsyrkrZhxbcQyMj7m1rV6XiD/2iyfv5Ps1aLjieN 5TZQwAY+3vXs+eXInwCy+lZ//RIIflM= Received: from mail-wr1-f69.google.com (mail-wr1-f69.google.com [209.85.221.69]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-255-CSRbGd_SPmGnIvPAIOlJNQ-1; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 04:56:43 -0400 X-MC-Unique: CSRbGd_SPmGnIvPAIOlJNQ-1 Received: by mail-wr1-f69.google.com with SMTP id l2-20020adfe5820000b029011a64161d6aso387374wrm.6 for ; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 01:56:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:to:cc:references:from:subject:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=yjYRtHCLwilP8mM4y+qRMfayYRV2WeZwLZenqhkPldo=; b=rQ/MHfsbzCwYW1CS6WSljgdaXNPAHpeRLa52pod5K455a1mYpXXTGaw+rqPEAvhSxF yngPRalsjwCKcHZituzMdHxkUU/X4Las0PevV8fFSivoZxSSH1ccORY2IkugV3c55+na 3e+09USaZrIDPMKD029Gv5cW3pjNsKZJsTco0KjqA+RxYVQ2qLKJ8IeWr603NlBGEGkH r+bvTmdu1Mr77uwfEMsmAp6TU5O8/WiHg+SG/oJL84czERr9rK6GpzuAZAGZvL+rYujU Glxk2TiIiuKA8PPKgeBGp/GEEUssrXhUlyxr/ykQYOtwbRX626ddOFPO6IfEhr39EStG YuGA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530/OqiA2tL2B/SylV8SqufNd5C1rvLARMaVYlGRQeo+QEaMvT9d 9NZw3YLF83APpSAT7SKTaDDFBwKefFcldqp/P+pIMf+3PSexIi8ee9bA00JFfT3V0eXId9po9JD whoHilCcDsL5l4FU= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:178e:: with SMTP id e14mr2987925wrg.246.1623747402380; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 01:56:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx895UxES6Vr5Kt3AtwZUtasXmEYWE9nHXMC5s8bNbQz3Jz9sY4V+lGWrRcivK70nbLQWsXvQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:178e:: with SMTP id e14mr2987885wrg.246.1623747402185; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 01:56:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from thuth.remote.csb (pd9e831d2.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [217.232.49.210]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l31sm14967916wms.31.2021.06.15.01.56.40 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 15 Jun 2021 01:56:41 -0700 (PDT) To: John Snow , QEMU Developers References: <0a19af15-2f34-4934-c6c9-113e49f5f1f2@redhat.com> From: Thomas Huth Subject: Re: [RFC] GitLab issue tracker labeling process: arch/target, os, and accel labels Message-ID: <50c71eb7-02ba-a7a9-9ed3-a1908cc832e7@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 10:56:40 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <0a19af15-2f34-4934-c6c9-113e49f5f1f2@redhat.com> Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=thuth@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=216.205.24.124; envelope-from=thuth@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -34 X-Spam_score: -3.5 X-Spam_bar: --- X-Spam_report: (-3.5 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.489, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Peter Maydell , David Hildenbrand , Bin Meng , Mark Cave-Ayland , Max Filippov , Taylor Simpson , Alistair Francis , "Edgar E. Iglesias" , Marek Vasut , Yoshinori Sato , Kamil Rytarowski , Reinoud Zandijk , =?UTF-8?Q?Philippe_Mathieu-Daud=c3=a9?= , Artyom Tarasenko , Eduardo Habkost , Stefan Weil , Richard Henderson , Greg Kurz , Michael Rolnik , Stafford Horne , =?UTF-8?Q?Alex_Benn=c3=a9e?= , David Gibson , =?UTF-8?Q?Daniel_P=2e_Berrang=c3=a9?= , Bastian Koppelmann , Chris Wulff , Laurent Vivier , Palmer Dabbelt , Paolo Bonzini Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On 14/06/2021 19.32, John Snow wrote: [...] > RTH raises the issue of the "TCI" subsystem of TCG, which is not a full > accelerator in its own right, but (I think) a special case of TCG. If I keep > the 1:1 mapping to ACCEL_CLASS_NAME, "accel: TCI" is inappropriate. > > Some suggestions: > - "TCI" by itself, simple enough. > - "TCG-TCI" or "TCG: TCI" or "TCG/TCI" or similar, so that it shows up in > label search when you search for 'tcg'. > - "accel: TCG:TCI". Similar to above but uses the "accel:" prefix too. I wonder whether we need a label for TCI at all... I can't recall having ever seen a bug ticket filed for TCI. It's quite a special use-case with some few users only, so it's maybe not worth the effort to create a separate label for this... just my 0.02 €. > We probably want to keep a set of labels that apply to the host > architecture. These are useful for build failures, environment setup issues, > or just documenting the exact environment on which an issue was observed. > > We won't likely require the full set of targets to be duplicated for this > purpose: possibly just the most common ones. I assume those are: > > arm, i386, ppc, s390x > > How should we tag those? "host-arch: XXX"? "host-arch" sounds fine to me. I think you can limit the selection here to the list of TCG backends that we support: arm, i386, mips, ppc, riscv, s390x, sparc ... and maybe tci here (i.e. "host-arch: tci")? Thomas