From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from eastrmfepo103.cox.net ([68.230.241.215]:58298 "EHLO eastrmfepo103.cox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755885Ab3AXUwo (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Jan 2013 15:52:44 -0500 Received: from eastrmimpo210 ([68.230.241.225]) by eastrmfepo103.cox.net (InterMail vM.8.01.04.00 201-2260-137-20101110) with ESMTP id <20130124205243.QANK23841.eastrmfepo103.cox.net@eastrmimpo210> for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 15:52:43 -0500 Message-ID: <51019F1A.4070408@czarc.net> Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 15:52:42 -0500 From: Gene Czarcinski MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Anand Jain CC: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, dsterba@suse.cz Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] add show sub-command for btrfs subvol cli References: <1358928771-31960-1-git-send-email-anand.jain@oracle.com> In-Reply-To: <1358928771-31960-1-git-send-email-anand.jain@oracle.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 01/23/2013 03:12 AM, Anand Jain wrote: > Please accept this patch set which is on top of > git://repo.or.cz/btrfs-progs-unstable/devel.git for-chris > > to add 'show' sub-command feature for the btrfs subvol cli > as in an example below.. OK, in spite of saying that these patches did not apply clean, it was not terribly difficult to refit what did not apply. I did this in two steps: 1. I created the equivalent of the for-chris branch. This did not apply clean which surprised me. However, minor things easily handled manually in the first patch for utils.c and utils.h plus btrfs-lists.c in a later patch. 2. After creating a new set of patches from the above effort, I then moved to my working branch with includes all of the patches in the integration-20130121 branch [careful, patch 0023 has a conflict in mkfs.c] please others. This time it was a very small problem in cmds-qgroup.c. I am running it now. Gene