From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com ([141.146.126.69]:43154 "EHLO aserp1040.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753414Ab3AYJQb (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Jan 2013 04:16:31 -0500 Message-ID: <51024F10.5040100@oracle.com> Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 17:23:28 +0800 From: Anand Jain MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gene Czarcinski CC: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, dsterba@suse.cz Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] add show sub-command for btrfs subvol cli References: <1358928771-31960-1-git-send-email-anand.jain@oracle.com> <51019F1A.4070408@czarc.net> In-Reply-To: <51019F1A.4070408@czarc.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > OK, in spite of saying that these patches did not apply clean, it was > not terribly difficult to refit what did not apply. I did this in two > steps: > > 1. I created the equivalent of the for-chris branch. This did not apply > clean which surprised me. Yes I see it. Not sure where I went wrong, sorry about that, now I have sent V2 of this patch set which also includes Erics comments. > However, minor things easily handled manually > in the first patch for utils.c and utils.h plus btrfs-lists.c in a later > patch. > > 2. After creating a new set of patches from the above effort, I then > moved to my working branch with includes all of the patches in the > integration-20130121 branch [careful, patch 0023 has a conflict in > mkfs.c] please others. This time it was a very small problem in > cmds-qgroup.c. I am running it now. > > Gene