From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Or Gerlitz Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 for-next 2/6] IB/core: Add RSS and TSS QP groups Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 18:39:31 +0200 Message-ID: <511A7043.2030008@mellanox.com> References: <1360079337-8173-1-git-send-email-ogerlitz@mellanox.com> <1360079337-8173-3-git-send-email-ogerlitz@mellanox.com> <1828884A29C6694DAF28B7E6B8A8237368B99E0B@ORSMSX101.amr.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1828884A29C6694DAF28B7E6B8A8237368B99E0B-P5GAC/sN6hmkrb+BlOpmy7fspsVTdybXVpNB7YpNyf8@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: "Hefty, Sean" Cc: "roland-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org" , "linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , "erezsh-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org" , Shlomo Pongratz , Tzahi Oved List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On 11/02/2013 22:42, Hefty, Sean wrote: > or some QP creation flag, so that every user who wants to create a QP doesn't need to figure out what a QP group is and if their QP needs to be part of one? > > Then you wouldn't need to define IB_QPG_NONE. > another point in favor of using different/dedicated field for the QPG creation flags, is that unlike the other QP creation flags, they aren't subject to logical or but rather an exclusive or, that is a QP can't be both parent and child. Or. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html