From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933040Ab3BSOx3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Feb 2013 09:53:29 -0500 Received: from mail.windriver.com ([147.11.1.11]:44560 "EHLO mail.windriver.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932975Ab3BSOx2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Feb 2013 09:53:28 -0500 Message-ID: <512391DA.6090706@windriver.com> Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 09:53:14 -0500 From: Paul Gortmaker User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130106 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Randy Dunlap CC: Jiri Kosina , , Rob Landley , Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: update top level 00-INDEX file with new additions References: <1360873254-28937-1-git-send-email-paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> <51224F70.9050806@infradead.org> In-Reply-To: <51224F70.9050806@infradead.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [128.224.146.65] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 13-02-18 10:57 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 02/18/13 01:39, Jiri Kosina wrote: >> On Thu, 14 Feb 2013, Paul Gortmaker wrote: >> >>> It seems there are about 80 new, but undocumented addtions at >>> the top level Documentation directory. This fixes up the top >>> level 00-INDEX by adding new entries and deleting a couple orphans. >>> Some subdirs could probably still use a check/cleanup too though. > > After this patch, I would prefer to see a requirement that each Documentation/ > file contain a "topic" line and then generate INDEX files from those automatically... > > comments? Rules can sometimes be so inflexible as to prevent additions. I think I'd rather see a makefile target that does some sanity checks, so that kernel janitors and the like are more apt to send trivial patches before it falls behind by 80+ entries like it was just recently. Just my $0.02 opinion. P. -- > > >>> Acked-by: Rob Landley >>> Cc: Jiri Kosina >>> Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker >>> --- >>> >>> [vectoring this via trivial tree as requested by Rob] >> >> Applied, thanks. > >