From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnout Vandecappelle Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2013 18:20:42 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] new package: adns In-Reply-To: <5128BCD8.5030807@petroprogram.com> References: <1360959402-24775-1-git-send-email-stefan.froberg@petroprogram.com> <20130216030625.04d9545d@skate> <5128A8C4.6040804@petroprogram.com> <5128BA82.1080501@mind.be> <5128BCD8.5030807@petroprogram.com> Message-ID: <5128FA6A.3020802@mind.be> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net On 23/02/13 13:58, Stefan Fr?berg wrote: > Yes, that adns-1.4-cnamechain.patch is originally from their mailing > list but Gentoo hosts it too: > http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/net-libs/adns/files/adns-1.4-cnamechain.patch > > However, here's the problem: > As you can see that cnamechain patch is patch level -p0 > But those others patches are not. > > Even worse, that adns-1.4-rh514838.patch (patch level -p1) is extracted > from Fedora src.rpm file. > > And that adns-1.4-destdir.patch, AFAIK, can only be located from here > (and is also patch level -p0) > https://build.opensuse.org/package/view_file?file=adns-1.4-destdir.patch&package=adns&project=devel%3Alibraries%3Ac_c%2B%2B > > So it's a mess and I don't think using direct download method will ever > work for this complete patch set. In that case, keep it in the buildroot tree but clean up the redundant stuff -- I'll flag in the original commit where the redundant stuff is. Regards, Arnout -- Arnout Vandecappelle arnout at mind be Senior Embedded Software Architect +32-16-286500 Essensium/Mind http://www.mind.be G.Geenslaan 9, 3001 Leuven, Belgium BE 872 984 063 RPR Leuven LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/arnoutvandecappelle GPG fingerprint: 7CB5 E4CC 6C2E EFD4 6E3D A754 F963 ECAB 2450 2F1F