Ping.

On 2013-02-18 16:09, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> Hi Steffen,
> 
> On 2013-01-25 11:01, Steffen Trumtrar wrote:
> 
>> +/* VESA display monitor timing parameters */
>> +#define VESA_DMT_HSYNC_LOW		BIT(0)
>> +#define VESA_DMT_HSYNC_HIGH		BIT(1)
>> +#define VESA_DMT_VSYNC_LOW		BIT(2)
>> +#define VESA_DMT_VSYNC_HIGH		BIT(3)
>> +
>> +/* display specific flags */
>> +#define DISPLAY_FLAGS_DE_LOW		BIT(0)	/* data enable flag */
>> +#define DISPLAY_FLAGS_DE_HIGH		BIT(1)
>> +#define DISPLAY_FLAGS_PIXDATA_POSEDGE	BIT(2)	/* drive data on pos. edge */
>> +#define DISPLAY_FLAGS_PIXDATA_NEGEDGE	BIT(3)	/* drive data on neg. edge */
>> +#define DISPLAY_FLAGS_INTERLACED	BIT(4)
>> +#define DISPLAY_FLAGS_DOUBLESCAN	BIT(5)
> 
> <snip>
> 
>> +	unsigned int dmt_flags;	/* VESA DMT flags */
>> +	unsigned int data_flags; /* video data flags */
> 
> Why did you go for this approach? To be able to represent
> true/false/not-specified?
> 
> Would it be simpler to just have "flags" field? What does it give us to
> have those two separately?
> 
> Should the above say raising edge/falling edge instead of positive
> edge/negative edge?
> 
>  Tomi
>