* Re: xfstests: 301: sparse copy between different filesystems/mountpoints on btrfs
[not found] <50F9C331.9000501@oracle.com>
@ 2013-03-10 0:24 ` Eric Sandeen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Eric Sandeen @ 2013-03-10 0:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Koen De Wit; +Cc: xfs, linux-btrfs
On 1/18/13 3:48 PM, Koen De Wit wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Koen De Wit <koen.de.wit@oracle.com>
>
> ---
> 301 | 95
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 301.out | 7 ++++
> 2 files changed, 102 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 301
> create mode 100644 301.out
> Invalid cross-device link
> +0
Seems like the above lines should be at the end of the patch (?)
> diff --git a/301 b/301
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..05b9b39
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/301
> @@ -0,0 +1,95 @@
> +#! /bin/bash
> +# FS QA Test No. 301
> +#
> +# Check if creating a sparse copy ("reflink") of a file on btrfs
> +# expectedly fails when it's done betweeen different filesystems or
> +# different mount points of the same filesystem.
> +#
> +# For both situations, these actions are executed:
> +# - Copy a file with the reflink=auto option.
> +# A normal copy should be created.
> +# - Copy a file with the reflink=always option. Should result in error,
> +# no file should be created.
> +#
> +#-----------------------------------------------------------------------
> +# Copyright (c) 2013, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All Rights Reserved.
> +#
> +# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
> +# modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as
> +# published by the Free Software Foundation.
> +#
> +# This program is distributed in the hope that it would be useful,
> +# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> +# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
> +# GNU General Public License for more details.
> +#
> +# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
> +# along with this program; if not, write the Free Software Foundation,
> +# Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA
> +#-----------------------------------------------------------------------
> +#
> +# creator
> +owner=koen.de.wit@oracle.com
> +
> +seq=`basename $0`
> +echo "QA output created by $seq"
> +
> +here=`pwd`
> +tmp=/tmp/$$
> +status=1 # failure is the default!
> +trap "_cleanup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15
> +
> +_cleanup()
> +{
> + cd /
> + rm -f $tmp.*
> +}
> +
> +# get standard environment, filters and checks
> +. ./common.rc
> +. ./common.filter
> +
> +# real QA test starts here
> +_supported_fs btrfs
> +_supported_os Linux
> +
> +_require_scratch
> +_require_cp_reflink
same deal, need thisdefinition
> +
> +TESTDIR1=$TEST_DIR/test-$seq.$$
> +TESTDIR2=$SCRATCH_MNT/test-$seq.$$
> +TESTDIR3=$SCRATCH_MNT/test-bis-$seq.$$
I might drop the .$$ for reasons stated earlier, etc.
You might also consider not naming something on $SCRATCH_MNT
as $TESTDIR when there's another standard variable named $TEST_DIR -
it's confusing. Maybe name them as TEST_SOURCEDIR,
SCRATCH_TARGETDIR1, or similar, to make it easier to keep it
straight when reading the test.
> +
> +mkdir $TESTDIR1
> +_scratch_mkfs
> +$XFS_IO_PROG -f -c 'pwrite -S 0x61 0 9000' $TESTDIR1/original > /dev/null
> +
> +_filter_testdirs()
> +{
> + sed -e "s,$TESTDIR1,TESTDIR1,g" \
> + -e "s,$TESTDIR2,TESTDIR2,g" \
> + -e "s,$TESTDIR3,TESTDIR3,g"
> +}
> +
> +_create_reflinks_to()
> +{
> + mkdir $1
> + cp --reflink=auto $TESTDIR1/original $1/copy
> + md5sum $1/copy | $AWK_PROG 'END {print $1}'
for more output context:
md5sum $1/copy | _filter_testdirs
> + rm -rf $1
> + mkdir $1
> + cp --reflink=always $TESTDIR1/original $1/copyfail 2>&1 |
> _filter_testdirs
patch wrapped
> + ls $1/copyfail | wc -l
Here if you dropped the $$ from the filename and did:
ls $1/copyfail | _filter_testdirs
the output might be more informative on a failure?
> +}
> +
> +_scratch_mount
> +_create_reflinks_to $TESTDIR2
> +_scratch_unmount
> +
> +mount $TEST_DEV $SCRATCH_MNT
> +_create_reflinks_to $TESTDIR3
> +umount $SCRATCH_MNT
TBH this confuses me, not that it's necessarily wrong (?)
You mount TEST_DEV on $SCRATCH_MNT which makes my brain hurt a little.
Then _create_reflinks_to $TESTDIR3 and at that point, um, what's going on,
what's linking what to where?
Some comments about what is being tested & the expected result,
maybe w/ echos like mentioned before, and descriptive var names
would help me, at least.
> +
> +# success, all done
> +status=0
> +exit
> diff --git a/301.out b/301.out
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..3b66682
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/301.out
> @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
> +QA output created by 301
> +42d69d1a6d333a7ebdf64792a555e392
> +cp: failed to clone `TESTDIR2/copyfail' from `TESTDIR1/original': Invalid cross-device link
Hm, my cp fails like:
+cp: failed to clone `TESTDIR3/copyfail': Invalid cross-device link
so might need a special filter to catch both variants.
> +0
> +42d69d1a6d333a7ebdf64792a555e392
> +cp: failed to clone `TESTDIR3/copyfail' from `TESTDIR1/original':
malformed patch, supposed to be 7 new lines but only 6.
Thanks,
-Eric
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: xfstests: 301: sparse copy between different filesystems/mountpoints on btrfs
@ 2013-03-10 0:24 ` Eric Sandeen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Eric Sandeen @ 2013-03-10 0:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Koen De Wit; +Cc: linux-btrfs, xfs
On 1/18/13 3:48 PM, Koen De Wit wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Koen De Wit <koen.de.wit@oracle.com>
>
> ---
> 301 | 95
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 301.out | 7 ++++
> 2 files changed, 102 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 301
> create mode 100644 301.out
> Invalid cross-device link
> +0
Seems like the above lines should be at the end of the patch (?)
> diff --git a/301 b/301
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..05b9b39
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/301
> @@ -0,0 +1,95 @@
> +#! /bin/bash
> +# FS QA Test No. 301
> +#
> +# Check if creating a sparse copy ("reflink") of a file on btrfs
> +# expectedly fails when it's done betweeen different filesystems or
> +# different mount points of the same filesystem.
> +#
> +# For both situations, these actions are executed:
> +# - Copy a file with the reflink=auto option.
> +# A normal copy should be created.
> +# - Copy a file with the reflink=always option. Should result in error,
> +# no file should be created.
> +#
> +#-----------------------------------------------------------------------
> +# Copyright (c) 2013, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All Rights Reserved.
> +#
> +# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
> +# modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as
> +# published by the Free Software Foundation.
> +#
> +# This program is distributed in the hope that it would be useful,
> +# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> +# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
> +# GNU General Public License for more details.
> +#
> +# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
> +# along with this program; if not, write the Free Software Foundation,
> +# Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA
> +#-----------------------------------------------------------------------
> +#
> +# creator
> +owner=koen.de.wit@oracle.com
> +
> +seq=`basename $0`
> +echo "QA output created by $seq"
> +
> +here=`pwd`
> +tmp=/tmp/$$
> +status=1 # failure is the default!
> +trap "_cleanup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15
> +
> +_cleanup()
> +{
> + cd /
> + rm -f $tmp.*
> +}
> +
> +# get standard environment, filters and checks
> +. ./common.rc
> +. ./common.filter
> +
> +# real QA test starts here
> +_supported_fs btrfs
> +_supported_os Linux
> +
> +_require_scratch
> +_require_cp_reflink
same deal, need thisdefinition
> +
> +TESTDIR1=$TEST_DIR/test-$seq.$$
> +TESTDIR2=$SCRATCH_MNT/test-$seq.$$
> +TESTDIR3=$SCRATCH_MNT/test-bis-$seq.$$
I might drop the .$$ for reasons stated earlier, etc.
You might also consider not naming something on $SCRATCH_MNT
as $TESTDIR when there's another standard variable named $TEST_DIR -
it's confusing. Maybe name them as TEST_SOURCEDIR,
SCRATCH_TARGETDIR1, or similar, to make it easier to keep it
straight when reading the test.
> +
> +mkdir $TESTDIR1
> +_scratch_mkfs
> +$XFS_IO_PROG -f -c 'pwrite -S 0x61 0 9000' $TESTDIR1/original > /dev/null
> +
> +_filter_testdirs()
> +{
> + sed -e "s,$TESTDIR1,TESTDIR1,g" \
> + -e "s,$TESTDIR2,TESTDIR2,g" \
> + -e "s,$TESTDIR3,TESTDIR3,g"
> +}
> +
> +_create_reflinks_to()
> +{
> + mkdir $1
> + cp --reflink=auto $TESTDIR1/original $1/copy
> + md5sum $1/copy | $AWK_PROG 'END {print $1}'
for more output context:
md5sum $1/copy | _filter_testdirs
> + rm -rf $1
> + mkdir $1
> + cp --reflink=always $TESTDIR1/original $1/copyfail 2>&1 |
> _filter_testdirs
patch wrapped
> + ls $1/copyfail | wc -l
Here if you dropped the $$ from the filename and did:
ls $1/copyfail | _filter_testdirs
the output might be more informative on a failure?
> +}
> +
> +_scratch_mount
> +_create_reflinks_to $TESTDIR2
> +_scratch_unmount
> +
> +mount $TEST_DEV $SCRATCH_MNT
> +_create_reflinks_to $TESTDIR3
> +umount $SCRATCH_MNT
TBH this confuses me, not that it's necessarily wrong (?)
You mount TEST_DEV on $SCRATCH_MNT which makes my brain hurt a little.
Then _create_reflinks_to $TESTDIR3 and at that point, um, what's going on,
what's linking what to where?
Some comments about what is being tested & the expected result,
maybe w/ echos like mentioned before, and descriptive var names
would help me, at least.
> +
> +# success, all done
> +status=0
> +exit
> diff --git a/301.out b/301.out
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..3b66682
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/301.out
> @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
> +QA output created by 301
> +42d69d1a6d333a7ebdf64792a555e392
> +cp: failed to clone `TESTDIR2/copyfail' from `TESTDIR1/original': Invalid cross-device link
Hm, my cp fails like:
+cp: failed to clone `TESTDIR3/copyfail': Invalid cross-device link
so might need a special filter to catch both variants.
> +0
> +42d69d1a6d333a7ebdf64792a555e392
> +cp: failed to clone `TESTDIR3/copyfail' from `TESTDIR1/original':
malformed patch, supposed to be 7 new lines but only 6.
Thanks,
-Eric
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: xfstests: 301: sparse copy between different filesystems/mountpoints on btrfs
2013-03-10 0:24 ` Eric Sandeen
@ 2013-03-10 23:03 ` Dave Chinner
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Dave Chinner @ 2013-03-10 23:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Sandeen; +Cc: Koen De Wit, xfs, linux-btrfs
On Sat, Mar 09, 2013 at 06:24:47PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> On 1/18/13 3:48 PM, Koen De Wit wrote:
> > +}
> > +
> > +_scratch_mount
> > +_create_reflinks_to $TESTDIR2
> > +_scratch_unmount
> > +
> > +mount $TEST_DEV $SCRATCH_MNT
> > +_create_reflinks_to $TESTDIR3
> > +umount $SCRATCH_MNT
>
> TBH this confuses me, not that it's necessarily wrong (?)
> You mount TEST_DEV on $SCRATCH_MNT which makes my brain hurt a little.
> Then _create_reflinks_to $TESTDIR3 and at that point, um, what's going on,
> what's linking what to where?
Mounting the TEST_DEV on SCRATCH_MNT is almost always a bad thing to
do. The test harness expects TEST_DEV to be mounted on TEST_DIR, not
anywhere else.
If you need multiple scratch filesystems to test cross-device
linkage errors, use loopback devices or make use of the btrfs
scratch device pool...
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: xfstests: 301: sparse copy between different filesystems/mountpoints on btrfs
@ 2013-03-10 23:03 ` Dave Chinner
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Dave Chinner @ 2013-03-10 23:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Sandeen; +Cc: Koen De Wit, linux-btrfs, xfs
On Sat, Mar 09, 2013 at 06:24:47PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> On 1/18/13 3:48 PM, Koen De Wit wrote:
> > +}
> > +
> > +_scratch_mount
> > +_create_reflinks_to $TESTDIR2
> > +_scratch_unmount
> > +
> > +mount $TEST_DEV $SCRATCH_MNT
> > +_create_reflinks_to $TESTDIR3
> > +umount $SCRATCH_MNT
>
> TBH this confuses me, not that it's necessarily wrong (?)
> You mount TEST_DEV on $SCRATCH_MNT which makes my brain hurt a little.
> Then _create_reflinks_to $TESTDIR3 and at that point, um, what's going on,
> what's linking what to where?
Mounting the TEST_DEV on SCRATCH_MNT is almost always a bad thing to
do. The test harness expects TEST_DEV to be mounted on TEST_DIR, not
anywhere else.
If you need multiple scratch filesystems to test cross-device
linkage errors, use loopback devices or make use of the btrfs
scratch device pool...
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: xfstests: 301: sparse copy between different filesystems/mountpoints on btrfs
2013-03-10 23:03 ` Dave Chinner
@ 2013-03-11 1:40 ` Eric Sandeen
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Eric Sandeen @ 2013-03-11 1:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dave Chinner; +Cc: Koen De Wit, linux-btrfs, xfs
On 3/10/13 6:03 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 09, 2013 at 06:24:47PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>> On 1/18/13 3:48 PM, Koen De Wit wrote:
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +_scratch_mount
>>> +_create_reflinks_to $TESTDIR2
>>> +_scratch_unmount
>>> +
>>> +mount $TEST_DEV $SCRATCH_MNT
>>> +_create_reflinks_to $TESTDIR3
>>> +umount $SCRATCH_MNT
>>
>> TBH this confuses me, not that it's necessarily wrong (?)
>> You mount TEST_DEV on $SCRATCH_MNT which makes my brain hurt a little.
>> Then _create_reflinks_to $TESTDIR3 and at that point, um, what's going on,
>> what's linking what to where?
>
> Mounting the TEST_DEV on SCRATCH_MNT is almost always a bad thing to
> do. The test harness expects TEST_DEV to be mounted on TEST_DIR, not
> anywhere else.
>
> If you need multiple scratch filesystems to test cross-device
> linkage errors, use loopback devices or make use of the btrfs
> scratch device pool...
Actually, looking at it again - does this wind up with TEST_DEV mounted
on both TEST_DIR and SCRATCH_MNT? Maybe what the test wants is more
mountpoints, not more devices?
-Eric
> Cheers,
>
> Dave.
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: xfstests: 301: sparse copy between different filesystems/mountpoints on btrfs
@ 2013-03-11 1:40 ` Eric Sandeen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Eric Sandeen @ 2013-03-11 1:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dave Chinner; +Cc: Koen De Wit, linux-btrfs, xfs
On 3/10/13 6:03 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 09, 2013 at 06:24:47PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>> On 1/18/13 3:48 PM, Koen De Wit wrote:
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +_scratch_mount
>>> +_create_reflinks_to $TESTDIR2
>>> +_scratch_unmount
>>> +
>>> +mount $TEST_DEV $SCRATCH_MNT
>>> +_create_reflinks_to $TESTDIR3
>>> +umount $SCRATCH_MNT
>>
>> TBH this confuses me, not that it's necessarily wrong (?)
>> You mount TEST_DEV on $SCRATCH_MNT which makes my brain hurt a little.
>> Then _create_reflinks_to $TESTDIR3 and at that point, um, what's going on,
>> what's linking what to where?
>
> Mounting the TEST_DEV on SCRATCH_MNT is almost always a bad thing to
> do. The test harness expects TEST_DEV to be mounted on TEST_DIR, not
> anywhere else.
>
> If you need multiple scratch filesystems to test cross-device
> linkage errors, use loopback devices or make use of the btrfs
> scratch device pool...
Actually, looking at it again - does this wind up with TEST_DEV mounted
on both TEST_DIR and SCRATCH_MNT? Maybe what the test wants is more
mountpoints, not more devices?
-Eric
> Cheers,
>
> Dave.
>
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-03-11 1:40 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <50F9C331.9000501@oracle.com>
2013-03-10 0:24 ` xfstests: 301: sparse copy between different filesystems/mountpoints on btrfs Eric Sandeen
2013-03-10 0:24 ` Eric Sandeen
2013-03-10 23:03 ` Dave Chinner
2013-03-10 23:03 ` Dave Chinner
2013-03-11 1:40 ` Eric Sandeen
2013-03-11 1:40 ` Eric Sandeen
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.