From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jason Wang Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] virtio: support IOMMU platform Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 12:07:43 +0800 Message-ID: <51407c2a-2359-d8a6-9842-f6dda6646f7a@redhat.com> References: <1475051112-5108-1-git-send-email-jasowang@redhat.com> <1475051112-5108-2-git-send-email-jasowang@redhat.com> <20161007042444.jbfoimmbuaxh2ped@redhat.com> <20161011041445.GK1597@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org, huawei.xie@intel.com, vkaplans@redhat.com To: Yuanhan Liu , "Michael S. Tsirkin" Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05AA16CD2 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2016 06:07:50 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <20161011041445.GK1597@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On 2016年10月11日 12:14, Yuanhan Liu wrote: > On Fri, Oct 07, 2016 at 07:24:44AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 04:25:12PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: >>> Negotiate VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM to have IOMMU support. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang >>> --- >>> Changes from v1: >>> - remove unnecessary NEED_MAPPING flag >> One thing we probably should do is enable this flag >> with VFIO but not with UIO or VFIO-noiommu. > Good suggestion. I think we could do that in another patch. Yes. > >>> --- >>> drivers/net/virtio/virtio_ethdev.h | 3 ++- >>> drivers/net/virtio/virtio_pci.h | 3 ++- >>> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_ethdev.h b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_ethdev.h >>> index 2ecec6e..04a06e2 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_ethdev.h >>> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_ethdev.h >>> @@ -63,7 +63,8 @@ >>> 1u << VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_RX | \ >>> 1u << VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_VLAN | \ >>> 1u << VIRTIO_NET_F_MRG_RXBUF | \ >>> - 1ULL << VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1) >>> + 1ULL << VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1 | \ >>> + 1ULL << VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM ) >> Space before ) looks kind of ugly. > Yes, a bit. I will remove it while apply. > >>> #define VIRTIO_TRANSPORT_F_START 28 >>> -#define VIRTIO_TRANSPORT_F_END 32 >>> +#define VIRTIO_TRANSPORT_F_END 34 >>> >> This seems unused. Drop it? > Indeed. I will submit a patch to remove both (_START and _END). > > --yliu Thanks