From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:56319) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UIbDh-0006b1-Rx for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 21 Mar 2013 04:51:34 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UIbDe-0008QM-S4 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 21 Mar 2013 04:51:33 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:25296) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UIbDe-0008QE-Hj for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 21 Mar 2013 04:51:30 -0400 Message-ID: <514ACA0B.7030706@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 09:51:23 +0100 From: Gerd Hoffmann MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1363772625-9182-1-git-send-email-kraxel@redhat.com> <1363772625-9182-23-git-send-email-kraxel@redhat.com> <514ABC48.4070606@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <514ABC48.4070606@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 22/23] gtk: show a window for each graphical QemuConsole List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell Cc: Anthony Liguori , qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 03/21/13 08:52, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > On 03/20/13 21:06, Peter Maydell wrote: >> On 20 March 2013 09:43, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: >>> Multihead support: For each graphical console we'll create a gtk >>> window, so with multiple graphics cards installed you get a gtk window >>> for each. vte tabs are attached to the console #0 window. >> >> So is this going to mean arm's vexpress-a9 gets a pointless >> new second window? [there are two display devices in it]. > > I don't think so, given that multiple graphical consoles are not really > supported by qemu today. > > Basically you get one window per graphical_console_init(). Ahem, well, there is a second window now. >> If so, we're going to need to model what the hardware actually >> does, which is that there's a single connection on the back >> of the box for a monitor, and it's guest software controllable >> which of the two display devices is routed to the connection... > > How does this work in 1.4? I guess the second display device was never ever shown anywhere? cheers, Gerd