On 04/11/2013 05:17 PM, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-03-25 at 20:37 -0500, Mike Christie wrote:
>> Patches 1 - 3 look ok to me.
> 
> it looks like we're missing a patch 3/3?
> 

Did only I get it. I attached the mail I got with the patch in it.