From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Jackson Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Dual EMAC mode implementation of CPSW Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 19:00:49 +0100 Message-ID: <516C4051.2090100@mimc.co.uk> References: <1360612340-9266-1-git-send-email-mugunthanvnm@ti.com> <516B0098.4040809@mimc.co.uk> <516C33D2.4050105@ti.com> <516C38B9.50904@mimc.co.uk> <516C3A0D.70903@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Mugunthan V N Return-path: Received: from mercuryimc.plus.com ([80.229.200.144]:52356 "EHLO centos1.newflow.co.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752019Ab3DOSAv (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Apr 2013 14:00:51 -0400 In-Reply-To: <516C3A0D.70903@ti.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 15/04/13 18:34, Mugunthan V N wrote: > On 4/15/2013 10:58 PM, Mark Jackson wrote: >> On 15/04/13 18:07, Mugunthan V N wrote: >>> On 4/15/2013 12:46 AM, Mark Jackson wrote: >> >> >> >>>> >>>> Notice that at the end, the nfs link appears to come back "ok", but >>>> the "ps" command never completes. >>>> >>>> Any ideas of what's going on ? >>> >>> I have tried ping on both the interface fine. Will verify with ps again >>> later in this week. >>> Can you provide below details details >>> - Are you using EVMsk or custom build EVM? >> >> This is a custom board (based on the BeagleBone design) with dual >> Ethernet, NAND, NOR and FRAM. >> >> The dual emac thing is (one of) the last things to get signed off, so >> I'm willing to assist in tracking this down. > > After testing the scenario i may be able to send you an update later in > this week. Excellent ... if you've anything I can test now, I'd be happy to try. Cheers Mark J. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: mpfj-list@mimc.co.uk (Mark Jackson) Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 19:00:49 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 0/3] Dual EMAC mode implementation of CPSW In-Reply-To: <516C3A0D.70903@ti.com> References: <1360612340-9266-1-git-send-email-mugunthanvnm@ti.com> <516B0098.4040809@mimc.co.uk> <516C33D2.4050105@ti.com> <516C38B9.50904@mimc.co.uk> <516C3A0D.70903@ti.com> Message-ID: <516C4051.2090100@mimc.co.uk> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 15/04/13 18:34, Mugunthan V N wrote: > On 4/15/2013 10:58 PM, Mark Jackson wrote: >> On 15/04/13 18:07, Mugunthan V N wrote: >>> On 4/15/2013 12:46 AM, Mark Jackson wrote: >> >> >> >>>> >>>> Notice that at the end, the nfs link appears to come back "ok", but >>>> the "ps" command never completes. >>>> >>>> Any ideas of what's going on ? >>> >>> I have tried ping on both the interface fine. Will verify with ps again >>> later in this week. >>> Can you provide below details details >>> - Are you using EVMsk or custom build EVM? >> >> This is a custom board (based on the BeagleBone design) with dual >> Ethernet, NAND, NOR and FRAM. >> >> The dual emac thing is (one of) the last things to get signed off, so >> I'm willing to assist in tracking this down. > > After testing the scenario i may be able to send you an update later in > this week. Excellent ... if you've anything I can test now, I'd be happy to try. Cheers Mark J.