From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: John Stultz Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] ARM 64 bit sched_clock take #2 Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 10:00:38 -0700 Message-ID: <51756CB6.5060607@linaro.org> References: <51709FD7.8050408@gmail.com> <1366417746-24990-1-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-pa0-f53.google.com ([209.85.220.53]:35542 "EHLO mail-pa0-f53.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753763Ab3DVRAn (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Apr 2013 13:00:43 -0400 Received: by mail-pa0-f53.google.com with SMTP id bh4so3729251pad.40 for ; Mon, 22 Apr 2013 10:00:42 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1366417746-24990-1-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org> Sender: linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org To: Stephen Boyd Cc: Rob Herring , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Russell King , arm@kernel.org, Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Thomas Gleixner On 04/19/2013 05:29 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote: > This is what I was thinking. I don't see why we can't move this to generic code and have arm64 use it too. Those patches will follow once I find an arm64 > compiler. I think moving this to generic code sounds like a good idea. You could probably also prototype and test the 64bit code with x86_64, using the TSC counter. thanks -john From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: john.stultz@linaro.org (John Stultz) Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 10:00:38 -0700 Subject: [PATCH 0/4] ARM 64 bit sched_clock take #2 In-Reply-To: <1366417746-24990-1-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org> References: <51709FD7.8050408@gmail.com> <1366417746-24990-1-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org> Message-ID: <51756CB6.5060607@linaro.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 04/19/2013 05:29 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote: > This is what I was thinking. I don't see why we can't move this to generic code and have arm64 use it too. Those patches will follow once I find an arm64 > compiler. I think moving this to generic code sounds like a good idea. You could probably also prototype and test the 64bit code with x86_64, using the TSC counter. thanks -john