All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chen Gang <gang.chen@asianux.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel/audit_tree.c: tree will memory leak when failure occurs for audit_trim_trees()
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 09:46:50 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5175E80A.7030908@asianux.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130422160409.471f6208099a972d26c29fb9@linux-foundation.org>

On 2013年04月23日 07:04, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Apr 2013 17:39:06 +0800 Chen Gang <gang.chen@asianux.com> wrote:
> 
>>
>> in audit_trim_trees(), has called get_tree() before failure occurs,
>> so need also call put_tree after go to skip_it:
>>
>> ...
>>
>> --- a/kernel/audit_tree.c
>> +++ b/kernel/audit_tree.c
>> @@ -617,10 +617,10 @@ void audit_trim_trees(void)
>>  		}
>>  		spin_unlock(&hash_lock);
>>  		trim_marked(tree);
>> -		put_tree(tree);
>>  		drop_collected_mounts(root_mnt);
>>  skip_it:
>>  		mutex_lock(&audit_filter_mutex);
>> +		put_tree(tree);
>>  	}
>>  	list_del(&cursor);
>>  	mutex_unlock(&audit_filter_mutex);
> 
> That looks right to me.
> 
> I think we can micro-optimise the code by performing the put_tree()
> before taking the mutex, to slightly reduce mutex hold times?
> 

  ok, thanks.

> --- a/kernel/audit_tree.c~kernel-audit_treec-tree-will-leak-memory-when-failure-occurs-in-audit_trim_trees-fix
> +++ a/kernel/audit_tree.c
> @@ -619,8 +619,8 @@ void audit_trim_trees(void)
>  		trim_marked(tree);
>  		drop_collected_mounts(root_mnt);
>  skip_it:
> -		mutex_lock(&audit_filter_mutex);
>  		put_tree(tree);
> +		mutex_lock(&audit_filter_mutex);
>  	}
>  	list_del(&cursor);
>  	mutex_unlock(&audit_filter_mutex);
> _
> 
> 
> 
> 


-- 
Chen Gang

Asianux Corporation

  reply	other threads:[~2013-04-23  1:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-04-19  9:39 [PATCH] kernel/audit_tree.c: tree will memory leak when failure occurs for audit_trim_trees() Chen Gang
2013-04-22 23:04 ` Andrew Morton
2013-04-23  1:46   ` Chen Gang [this message]
2013-05-06  7:41   ` [PATCH kernel-next] kernel/audit_tree.c: fix the original version merging issue for put_tree() Chen Gang
2013-05-09 12:53   ` [PATCH v2] kernel: audit_tree: resource management: need put_tree and goto Err when failure occures Chen Gang
2013-05-09 20:11     ` Andrew Morton
2013-05-10  2:08       ` Chen Gang
2013-05-10  9:50         ` Chen Gang
2013-05-10 11:29           ` Chen Gang
2013-05-13  2:54             ` Chen Gang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5175E80A.7030908@asianux.com \
    --to=gang.chen@asianux.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=eparis@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.