From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Sandeen Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfstests: regression test for ext4 resize with non-extent files Date: Thu, 09 May 2013 22:05:56 -0500 Message-ID: <518C6414.20800@redhat.com> References: <518C1D08.4080309@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ext4 development , xfs-oss To: guaneryu@gmail.com Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org On 5/9/13 10:03 PM, Eryu Guan wrote: > On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 6:02 AM, Eric Sandeen > wrote: > ... > index 53af708..4c3e2f4 100644 > --- a/tests/ext4/group > +++ b/tests/ext4/group > @@ -9,3 +9,4 @@ > 303 aio dangerous ioctl rw stress > 304 aio dangerous ioctl rw stress > 305 auto > +306 dangerous rw resize quick > > > I'm wondering why it's not in auto group :) because I forgot about auto! :) But it's also somewhat dangerous; it could oops or hang, so perhaps auto is not a good idea. -Eric > Otherwise patch looks good to me. > > Eryu Guan _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs