From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757077Ab3EWIT5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 May 2013 04:19:57 -0400 Received: from mga14.intel.com ([143.182.124.37]:22753 "EHLO mga14.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755024Ab3EWITz (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 May 2013 04:19:55 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.87,726,1363158000"; d="scan'208";a="306692992" Message-ID: <519DD110.3070002@intel.com> Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 16:19:28 +0800 From: Alex Shi User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130329 Thunderbird/17.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Changlong Xie CC: Peter Zijlstra , mingo@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de, akpm@linux-foundation.org, bp@alien8.de, pjt@google.com, namhyung@kernel.org, efault@gmx.de, morten.rasmussen@arm.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com, viresh.kumar@linaro.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , mgorman@suse.de, riel@redhat.com, wangyun@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Changlong Xie Subject: Re: [patch v6 8/8] sched: remove blocked_load_avg in tg References: <1368199049-2798-1-git-send-email-alex.shi@intel.com> <1368199049-2798-9-git-send-email-alex.shi@intel.com> <20130514083148.GD15942@dyad.programming.kicks-ass.net> <5192217D.5030706@intel.com> <20130516092308.GH19669@dyad.programming.kicks-ass.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 05/23/2013 03:32 PM, Changlong Xie wrote: > 2013/5/16 Peter Zijlstra : >> On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 07:35:25PM +0800, Alex Shi wrote: >> >>> I tested all benchmarks on cover letter maintained, aim7, kbuild etc. >>> with autogroup enabled. There is no clear performance change. >>> But since the machine just run benchmark without anyother load, that >>> doesn't enough. >> >> Back when we started with smp-fair cgroup muck someone wrote a test for it. I >> _think_ it ended up in the LTP test-suite. >> > > Hi Peter > > my test results: > 3.10-rc1 patch1-7 patch1-8 > duration=764 duration=754 duration=750 > duration=764 duration=754 duration=751 > duration=763 duration=755 duration=751 > > duration means the seconds of testing cost. > > Tested-by: Changlong Xie Seems the 8th patch is helpful on cgroup. Thanks Changlong! -- Thanks Alex