From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:41065) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UfST8-00048T-5c for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 23 May 2013 06:09:59 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UfST7-0006Hi-1q for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 23 May 2013 06:09:58 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:25773) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UfST6-0006H1-PX for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 23 May 2013 06:09:56 -0400 Message-ID: <519DEAE5.7030100@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 12:09:41 +0200 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <518C8FD7.9080201@profihost.ag> <20130510074217.GB1500@stefanha-thinkpad.redhat.com> <518CB8E4.5090305@profihost.ag> <51924A40.6090209@profihost.ag> <5192543C.4010305@profihost.ag> <6BCF67A6-A1D5-4B4D-B83D-DC32F7621C43@profihost.ag> <519C84AB.6050203@redhat.com> <6478F274-11C3-4000-B706-3FADA20D2B76@profihost.ag> In-Reply-To: <6478F274-11C3-4000-B706-3FADA20D2B76@profihost.ag> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] segfault in aio_bh_poll async.c:80 WAS: Re: kvm process disappears List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG Cc: Josh Durgin , Stefan Hajnoczi , qemu-devel , "pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com" , Michael Roth Il 22/05/2013 14:24, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG ha scritto: > Am 22.05.2013 um 10:41 schrieb Paolo Bonzini : > >> Il 22/05/2013 08:26, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG ha scritto: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> as i can't reproduce no ;-( i just saw the kernel segfault message and >>>> used addr2line and a qemu dbg package to get the code line. >>> >>> I've now seen this again for two or three times. It always happens >>> when we do an fstrim inside the guest. >> >> >>> And I've seen this first since josh async rbd patch. >> >> This one? >> >> commit dc7588c1eb3008bda53dde1d6b890cd299758155 > > Yes. But i'm not sure whether this is coincendence. Ok. >> Do you see it even with "-drive discard=off"? > > I use discard / trim for thin provisioning and need it. This is a > production system so I can't test without it. > > I use scsi virtio with discard_granularity=512 Note that 1.5.0 won't need this anymore, but it will need "-drive discard=on". Any chance you can try to reproduce it in a different environment? Paolo