From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:47197) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UfsjK-0004MQ-94 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 24 May 2013 10:12:29 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UfsjE-0005Gm-Lt for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 24 May 2013 10:12:26 -0400 Received: from mail-pb0-x22d.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c01::22d]:63878) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UfsjE-0005Fm-Eo for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 24 May 2013 10:12:20 -0400 Received: by mail-pb0-f45.google.com with SMTP id mc17so4285340pbc.4 for ; Fri, 24 May 2013 07:12:18 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <519F753C.5070708@ozlabs.ru> Date: Sat, 25 May 2013 00:12:12 +1000 From: Alexey Kardashevskiy MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1369133851-1894-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <519C2DC1.5010600@ozlabs.ru> <519C8EBD.7080107@redhat.com> <519E4D03.201@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <519E4D03.201@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/30] Introduction of IOMMUs into the memory API List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: peter.maydell@linaro.org, jan.kiszka@gmail.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, David Gibson On 05/24/2013 03:08 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Il 22/05/2013 11:24, Paolo Bonzini ha scritto: >> Il 22/05/2013 04:30, Alexey Kardashevskiy ha scritto: >>> On 05/21/2013 08:57 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>>> This is part 1 of the memory API updates for 1.6. (Part 2 is the >>>> introduction of get/set_owner, part 3 is the introduction of the >>>> RCU-style flatview). >>>> >>>> Compared to the first submissions, there are a few extra cleanup >>>> patches, and address_space_rw/read/write grew a return value so >>>> that the existing DMAContext API doesn't need to change. >>>> >>> >>> Is this series much different from the one in >>> https://github.com/bonzini/qemu/tree/iommu (hope it is the same :) )? >> >> Not much, I've updated the branch now. Does the memory region ref/unref patch go to series#2? > BTW, if you give me your Tested-by it would be good, since most comments > have been cosmetic. I'd like to collect all of Peter's Reviewed-by from > the RFC and send a pull request next week. With all the stuff I got now (qemu.org/master + your set + David's PCI patches + David's VFIO patches + my VFIO patches), it works for me. Tried for emulated PCI, VFIO, emulated IBM VIO (and in full emulaiton as well), have not found any problem so far. > Then we can proceed with the fun stuff. :) Go ahead :) -- Alexey