From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S966513Ab3E2PBw (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 May 2013 11:01:52 -0400 Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:21958 "EHLO mga02.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S966245Ab3E2PBv (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 May 2013 11:01:51 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.87,764,1363158000"; d="scan'208";a="342000266" Message-ID: <51A61844.1010403@linux.intel.com> Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 18:01:24 +0300 From: Eliezer Tamir User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: yaniv saar CC: Eric Dumazet , David Miller , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jesse Brandeburg , Don Skidmore , e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Willem de Bruijn , Andi Kleen , HPA , Eilon Greenstien , Or Gerlitz , Alex Rosenbaum , Eliezer Tamir Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 net-next 2/5] net: implement support for low latency socket polling References: <20130529063916.27486.3841.stgit@ladj378.jer.intel.com> <20130529063935.27486.18610.stgit@ladj378.jer.intel.com> <1369834647.5109.15.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <51A60A42.20905@linux.intel.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 29/05/2013 17:20, yaniv saar wrote: > Hi Eliezer, > > (If I'm too late then a future note...) > Why make polling a system-wide configuration? > Wouldn't it make more sense to implement a sock option? > An even better solution might be aggregation/combination of both types of > configurations. > > -- Yaniv Sa'ar We plan on adding a socket option in the future. -Eliezer