From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: George Dunlap Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/18][V6]: PVH xen: version 6 patches... Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2013 16:25:39 +0100 Message-ID: <51AF5873.7060801@eu.citrix.com> References: <1369445137-19755-1-git-send-email-mukesh.rathor@oracle.com> <20130605152316.GE28843@phenom.dumpdata.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20130605152316.GE28843@phenom.dumpdata.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Cc: ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com, Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, tim@xen.org, ian.campbell@citrix.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 05/06/13 16:23, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 06:25:19PM -0700, Mukesh Rathor wrote: >> I've version 6 of my patches for 64bit PVH guest for xen. This is Phase I. >> These patches are built on top of git >> c/s: 9204bc654562976c7cdebf21c6b5013f6e3057b3 >> >> V6: >> The biggest change in V6 is dropping of dom0 PVH. It will take some time >> to investigate and redo dom0 construct to use unmodified PV code. These >> patches in V6 will allow PV dom0 to create PVH domU. Please ack or indicate >> individual patches if there are no issues, so I know they have been looked >> at. > Ian, Tim, Ian, George, > > Are you guys waiting for Jan to review all the patches or just > the hypervisor ones before looking at the rest (say the libxl ones)? TBH I'm waiting until I have all the 4.3 stuff sorted out before even looking at them. -George