From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <sgw@linux.intel.com>
Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20])
	by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 923926A598
	for <openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>;
	Wed,  5 Jun 2013 17:19:54 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21])
	by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 05 Jun 2013 10:19:52 -0700
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.87,808,1363158000"; d="scan'208";a="348698994"
Received: from unknown (HELO [10.255.13.19]) ([10.255.13.19])
	by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 05 Jun 2013 10:19:50 -0700
Message-ID: <51AF7336.8050802@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2013 10:19:50 -0700
From: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
	rv:17.0) Gecko/20130514 Thunderbird/17.0.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br>
References: <1370417067-30166-1-git-send-email-nicolas.dechesne@linaro.org>
	<51AF67B8.20502@linux.intel.com>
	<CAP71WjzSHWmKYLTs3_Ao6Mt_sKnUdNCHM3dSMSs8FpKbVyuCoQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<51AF6E2F.8040309@linux.intel.com>
	<CAP9ODKrxMh3PGGwVHdVFcUL2-Ag4vA2bAKr+3PGKGNDzwMJnpg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAP9ODKrxMh3PGGwVHdVFcUL2-Ag4vA2bAKr+3PGKGNDzwMJnpg@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
	<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH dylan, master] Fix meta-toolchain-qte SDK build for x11-less DISTRO
X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
	<openembedded-core.lists.openembedded.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/options/openembedded-core>,
	<mailto:openembedded-core-request@lists.openembedded.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/>
List-Post: <mailto:openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openembedded-core-request@lists.openembedded.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core>,
	<mailto:openembedded-core-request@lists.openembedded.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2013 17:19:55 -0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 06/05/2013 10:12 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com
> <mailto:sgw@linux.intel.com>> wrote:
>
>     On 06/05/2013 09:32 AM, Nicolas Dechesne wrote:
>
>
>         On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 6:30 PM, Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com
>         <mailto:sgw@linux.intel.com>
>         <mailto:sgw@linux.intel.com <mailto:sgw@linux.intel.com>>> wrote:
>
>              You could just directly put the nativesdk-libx11 in place
>         of the
>              variable, no need to have the variable there.
>
>
>         yes, that's what I had initially, but found it was less easy to
>         read...
>         with X11DEPENDS it's more 'obvious' that there is something
>         special..
>         that said, i can make the change if that's really needed.
>
>     We do use the X11DEPENDS elsewhere when there are multiple
>     dependencies, but I also found cases where we just include the
>     dependency directly in the test. I was trying pick a direction:
>     single entry no X11DEPENDS, multiple entries use X11DEPENDS.
>
>     Comments, flames, ...
>
>
> Yes; I sent this patch in Febuary:
> http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/44759/
>
> Please use this one instead of the recent one.
>

Well reading back on that, it looks like I was waiting for an 
EXTRA_OECONF or related change to the autoconf scripts.

Sau!

> --
> Otavio Salvador                             O.S. Systems
> http://www.ossystems.com.br http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
> Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854            Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750