From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Massimo Canonico Subject: Re: CAP and performance problem Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2013 10:57:50 +0200 Message-ID: <51B04F0E.5040506@di.unipmn.it> References: <519B3832.30608@di.unipmn.it> <1370451024.18519.190.camel@Solace> <1370452319.18519.197.camel@Solace> <51AF6FBD.9090007@di.unipmn.it> <1370507870.18519.224.camel@Solace> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1370507870.18519.224.camel@Solace> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Dario Faggioli Cc: George Dunlap , xen-devel@lists.xen.org List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 06/06/2013 10:37 AM, Dario Faggioli wrote: > On mer, 2013-06-05 at 19:05 +0200, Massimo Canonico wrote: >> Hi Dario, >> and thanks for these test. >> >> I forgot to ask you which xen version has beed used for your experiments. >> > Yeah, me too! :-) > > I'm using xen-unstable, pulled yesterday (commit id > e430510e5cbbfcdc1077739292def633e70fedea), compiled and installed on a > Debian unstable system. Dom0 kernel is a bit old, as it's a 3.6. > > What about you? xen 4.2.2 kernel dom0: 3.8.11-200.fc18.x86_64 M > > Regards, > Dario >