From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Younger Liu Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 21:10:53 +0800 Subject: [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH v2] ocfs2: Rework transaction rollback in ocfs2_relink_block_group() In-Reply-To: <51C2933D.9030300@oracle.com> References: <51C2933D.9030300@oracle.com> Message-ID: <51C2FF5D.4050801@huawei.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com On 2013/6/20 13:29, Jeff Liu wrote: > From: Jie Liu > > In ocfs2_relink_block_group(), we roll back all those changes if > notify intent to modify buffers for metadata update failed even > if the relevant buffer has not yet been modified/got dirty at that > point, that are not quite right because of: > > - None buffer has been modified/dirty if failed to call > ocfs2_journal_access_gd() against the previous block group buffer > - Only the previous block group buffer has got dirty if failed to > call ocfs2_journal_access_gd() against the block group buffer > - There is no need to roll back the change for file entry buffer at all > > Those problems will not cause anything wrong but unnecessary. > This patch fix them and kill the useless bg_ptr variable as well. > > Signed-off-by: Jie Liu > Cc: Younger Liu Fine. Reviewed-by: Younger Liu > --- > fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c | 25 ++++++++++++------------- > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c b/fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c > index b7e74b5..101d16d 100644 > --- a/fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c > +++ b/fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c > @@ -1422,7 +1422,7 @@ static int ocfs2_relink_block_group(handle_t *handle, > int status; > /* there is a really tiny chance the journal calls could fail, > * but we wouldn't want inconsistent blocks in *any* case. */ > - u64 fe_ptr, bg_ptr, prev_bg_ptr; > + u64 bg_ptr, prev_bg_ptr; > struct ocfs2_dinode *fe = (struct ocfs2_dinode *) fe_bh->b_data; > struct ocfs2_group_desc *bg = (struct ocfs2_group_desc *) bg_bh->b_data; > struct ocfs2_group_desc *prev_bg = (struct ocfs2_group_desc *) prev_bg_bh->b_data; > @@ -1437,7 +1437,6 @@ static int ocfs2_relink_block_group(handle_t *handle, > (unsigned long long)le64_to_cpu(bg->bg_blkno), > (unsigned long long)le64_to_cpu(prev_bg->bg_blkno)); > > - fe_ptr = le64_to_cpu(fe->id2.i_chain.cl_recs[chain].c_blkno); > bg_ptr = le64_to_cpu(bg->bg_next_group); > prev_bg_ptr = le64_to_cpu(prev_bg->bg_next_group); > > @@ -1446,7 +1445,7 @@ static int ocfs2_relink_block_group(handle_t *handle, > OCFS2_JOURNAL_ACCESS_WRITE); > if (status < 0) { > mlog_errno(status); > - goto out_rollback; > + goto out; > } > > prev_bg->bg_next_group = bg->bg_next_group; > @@ -1456,7 +1455,7 @@ static int ocfs2_relink_block_group(handle_t *handle, > bg_bh, OCFS2_JOURNAL_ACCESS_WRITE); > if (status < 0) { > mlog_errno(status); > - goto out_rollback; > + goto out_rollback_prev_bg; > } > > bg->bg_next_group = fe->id2.i_chain.cl_recs[chain].c_blkno; > @@ -1466,21 +1465,21 @@ static int ocfs2_relink_block_group(handle_t *handle, > fe_bh, OCFS2_JOURNAL_ACCESS_WRITE); > if (status < 0) { > mlog_errno(status); > - goto out_rollback; > + goto out_rollback_bg; > } > > fe->id2.i_chain.cl_recs[chain].c_blkno = bg->bg_blkno; > ocfs2_journal_dirty(handle, fe_bh); > > -out_rollback: > - if (status < 0) { > - fe->id2.i_chain.cl_recs[chain].c_blkno = cpu_to_le64(fe_ptr); > - bg->bg_next_group = cpu_to_le64(bg_ptr); > - prev_bg->bg_next_group = cpu_to_le64(prev_bg_ptr); > - } > +out: > + return status; > > - if (status) > - mlog_errno(status); > +out_rollback_bg: > + bg->bg_next_group = cpu_to_le64(bg_ptr); > +out_rollback_prev_bg: > + prev_bg->bg_next_group = cpu_to_le64(prev_bg_ptr); > + > + mlog_errno(status); > return status; > } > >